BOARDING schools could be hit hard by a UK exit from the European Union, campaigners have warned.
The Boarding Schools' Association (BSA)said a vote to leave the EU would be a threat to a market worth £100 million a year to the UK because students would have to apply for visas.
The concerns were backed by John Edward, a spokesman for the Britain Stronger in Europe campaign who is also director of the Scottish Council of Independent Schools.
There are currently 5,000 students from the EU studying at UK boarding schools with more than 1,000 attracted to Scotland last year.
Robin Fletcher, chief executive of the BSA, which represents schools such as Glenalmond, in Perthshire, and Loretto, in Musselburgh, said: "There is high demand from parents and students across the world for UK education and this is particularly attractive for families from EU countries because they can come here without a visa.
"That changes completely, however, if Britain leaves the EU. Those same students will be regarded as overseas by the Home Office and will have to have visas which is complicated for parents and schools and may tempt some to look elsewhere."
Mr Edward added: If you are a parent in a genuinely global situation and sending your children overseas to school them sending them somewhere else doesn't really make much difference.
"If the UK was perceived to be a more administratively bureaucratic place to come and study that would undoubtedly impact on teacher and pupil recruitment."
However, Tom Harris, the former Labour MP who is heading up the Vote Leave campaign in Scotland argued that the reason independent schools were successful was because they provided a service people wanted to buy - which would not change if the UK left the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel