Under-fire oil giant BP narrowed losses in the first three months of the year as swingeing cost-cutting helped it offset falling crude prices.
The blue chip posted replacement cost losses of 485 million US dollars (£335 million) for the first three months of the year, down from losses of 2.2 billion US dollars (£1.5 billion) in the previous three months.
On an underlying basis, the group also defied expectations for a loss, posting adjusted profits of 532 million US dollars (£367 million), although this still marked a 79% plunge on the 2.58 billion US dollar (£1.8) profits a year earlier.
Read more: BP shareholders vote against £13.8m pay deal for chief Bob Dudley
The update comes less than two weeks after BP suffered an investor rebellion over its chief executive's pay deal at its annual general meeting, when almost 60% of shareholders rejected its remuneration report for the last year, which included a salary package of 19.6 million dollars (£13.8 million) for boss Bob Dudley.
Its figures show trading has improved markedly since a dire end to 2015, with oil prices touching near 13-year lows.
The global commodity price rout saw the cost of crude drop to 34 US dollars a barrel on average in the first three months of 2016 compared with 54 US dollars a year ago.
The oil price crash left BP nursing its largest annual loss for at least 20 years, slumping into the red by 5.2 billion US dollars (£3.6 billion) in 2015, surpassing even the mammoth losses seen in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon explosion and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.
While BP's losses have narrowed in the first quarter of 2016, it still compares with replacement cost profits of 2.1 billion US dollars (£1.4 billion) a year earlier.
Read more: Campaigners protest against BP sponsorship of Portrait Award
The group has been slashing costs and axing jobs, cutting around 10% of its workforce to offset the tough trading.
It said spending fell to 11% year on year in the first quarter and was expected to reach 17 billion US dollars (£11.7 billion) in 2016, but added it could cut this further to between 15 billion (£10.3 billion) and 17 billion dollars (£11.7 billion).
Shares in the group - a mainstay of British pension funds - rose 3% on the better-than-feared underlying figures.
Analysts had expected losses of 140 million US dollars (£96 million).
The cost of crude has bounced back in recent weeks, now trading at around 45 US dollars a barrel, while BP is also beginning to see the benefits of swingeing cost-cutting actions.
Mr Dudley said: "Despite the challenging environment, we are driving towards our near-term goal of rebalancing BP's cash flows."
He added that oil prices were expected to recover further.
"Market fundamentals continue to suggest that the combination of robust demand and weak supply growth will move global oil markets closer into balance by the end of the year," he said.
Joe Rundle, head of trading at ETX Capital, said overall BP posted a "good set of figures", but added that the results may "stick in the throat of some investors" in light of Mr Dudley's pay deal.
"While this shows progress, it needs to do more to cut costs," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here