A few weeks ago there were suggestions that Jeremy Corbyn’s team had barred Ken Livingstone from the airwaves.
No ban was in evidence, however, as the former London mayor toured broadcasting studios leaving more controversy in his wake with every interview.
But the reports did reveal an increasingly strained relationship between the old allies - even before Mr Livingstone's Hitler comments.
The two have been friendly for decades and Mr Livingstone was a vocal advocate for Mr Corbyn during Labour's leadership race.
But in recent months there were claims that 'Red Ken' had become a "loose cannon" and complaints he was heading a rival camp against the shadow chancellor John McDonnell.
Many Labour MPs were outraged when it was emerged that he would co-chair the party’s Trident review and furious when he went on television to suggest it could recommend leaving Nato.
He was eventually pushed out of the probe, following fears that Mr Livingstone himself was “becoming the story”.
This latest row is not the first time Mr Livingstone has courted controversy – or been embroiled in an anti-Semitism row.
In 2006 a judge said he had made "unnecessarily offensive" and "indefensible" remarks likening a Jewish reporter Oliver Finegold to a Nazi concentration camp guard, although he was cleared of bringing the mayor’s office into disrepute.
The 70-year-old joined Labour in 1969, and by 1974 was on the Greater London Council, where he raised eyebrows by, among other things, supporting Sinn Fein's leaders at the height of the IRA's bombing campaign.
After Thatcher abolished the GLC, he was an MP between 1987 and 2001 sitting on the backbenches alongside his fellow left-winger and New Labour critic Jeremy Corbyn.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here