PATIENTS were evacuated from Glasgow's new hospital today after a fire broke out in one of the single rooms on the 11th floor.
Police said a man has been charged in connection with the incident, which happened at around 2.12am today in ward 11 of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital.
The 37-year-old is a patient in the hospital and suffered injuries during the blaze.
A total of 17 patients were moved to other areas of the hospital after the alarm was raised.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said no patients or staff were injured due to the "swift and well rehearsed" actions of staff.
The fire was extinguished by the hospital's sprinkler system and the fire services and police were called to the scene.
Some patients due to be admitted to the hospital today are understood to have been sent home as a result of the fire.
One eyewitness told the Evening Times: "I accompanied a family member to the hospital this morning.
"She and several others were sent home again as the patients from ward 11 were evacuated because of a fire in the ward.
"They apparently had to be accommodated in the ward intended for those patients who were told to go home."
A spokeswoman for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said: "We can confirm that a fire occured in one of theh patient rooms at the QEUH.
"Police Scotland has subsequently charged a patient in connection with the incident.
"No other patients or staff were injured thanks to the swift and well rehearsed actions of staff who very quickly moved the other patients in the ward to other areas of the hospital and alerted the fire services and police."
A spokeswoma for Police Scotland said: "At approx. 2.12 am on Wednesday emergency services attended reports of a room on fire on the 11th floor at the QEUH.
"The fire was extinguished by the in house sprinkler system, however, 17 patients from the ward were evacuated as a precaution due to smoke damage.
"No one was injured.
"A 37 year old man is the subject of a report to the Procurator Fiscal in connection with the incident."
.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article