A French historian has hit out at the dilapidated state of Old St Kentigern's Church in Lanark where William Wallace got married.
Historian Bertrand Humeau was appalled to visit the historic site and find the building blocked off and disintegrating.
Mr Humeau said that if Wallace was alive today he would want his countrymen and women to rise up in protest against the dilapidated state of the building.
He was shocked at the rapid deterioration of Old St Kentigern's since his last visit to the town in 2009 after discovering access to the church has now been blocked off and walls are crumbling.
Mr Bertrand said: "The condition of the church today worries me. It looks like the place has been abandoned and the council is waiting for it to collapse before demolishing it.
"In 2009, it was still possible to approach the church and walk inside it. Now, the access is blocked and the site does not look very welcoming.
"As a French person with an in interest in William Wallace and Scottish history, I was very sad to find Saint Kentigern's in this condition.
"William Wallace would probably have rebelled against an administration not looking after its heritage. It took centuries to preserve it and, if we lose it, it will be lost forever."
Mr Humeau's interest in Scottish medieval history, and William Wallace in particular, was prompted by the Scots hero's own Norman ancestry.
This interest led him to make two previous trips, in 2007 and 2009, to visit the impressive ruin in which Wallace reportedly worshipped and married Marion Braidfute.
South Lanarkshire Council are responsible for the upkeep of Lanark cemetery, however, Lanark Community Development Trust have been charged with funding the refurbishment of St Kentigern's to become a national tourist attraction.
A Trust spokeswoman said: "Action plans to carry out urgent repair works to both the St Kentigern's Church, and the adjacent mausoleum, are currently being prepared by South Lanarkshire Council.
"The Trust cannot do anything until South Lanarkshire Council has stabilised the building but it is still very much a live project as far as we are concerned."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel