Holyrood's MSPs have been sworn in for the fifth session of the Scottish Parliament.
All 129 members took the oath or made a solemn affirmation in the parliament's chamber, with outgoing presiding officer Tricia Marwick overseeing proceedings.
SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon was first to be sworn in, underlining her party's "loyalty to the people of Scotland" and the "sovereignty of the people" before taking the affirmation.
She was followed by Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson and Scottish Labour counterpart Kezia Dugdale.
Ms Davidson's party took up the benches previously used by Labour, having become the second largest party with 31 seats.
Greens co-convener Patrick Harvie prefaced his affirmation - which includes swearing allegiance to the Queen - by highlighting his party's support for an "elected head of state".
Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie was sworn in wearing a large yellow rose on his lapel, while the Tories opted for thistles, Labour for red roses and the SNP the "white rose of Scotland".
The rose was the subject of Hugh MacDiarmid poem The Little White Rose, and has been worn by SNP members as they are sworn in at Holyrood since 1999.
Party leaders were followed by MSPs in alphabetical order.
Several MSPs made their oaths in other languages as well as English, including Gaelic, Doric and Scots.
SNP MSP for Glasgow Pollok Humza Yousaf was the final member to be sworn in and he also took the oath in Urdu, reflecting his Pakistani heritage.
The first job for the new members is to elect a new presiding officer as Mrs Marwick is retiring.
The role is politically neutral with responsibilities including chairing sessions of parliament in Holyrood's debating chamber and representing the parliament at home and abroad.
A number of high-profile MSPs are in the running for the position, with former Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont among the first to announce her candidacy.
Labour MSPs Ken Macintosh and Elaine Smith and Conservative members Murdo Fraser and John Scott have also put themselves forward for the position.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel