Adele is reportedly due to sign a £90 million record contract, landing the biggest deal ever handed to a British musician.
The Sony Music contract would top the £80 million Robbie Williams landed from EMI in 2002 and would give her the best deal ever handed to a female artist, dwarfing the £70 million Whitney Houston scored in 2001 from Arista.
Whitney Houston scored a £70m deal in 2001 from Arista (Fiona Hanson/PA)
A source at Sony Music told The Sun: “We’ve secured Adele, who’s without doubt the biggest music star in a generation. This is massive.”
The singer is already worth £85 million, according to the Sunday Times Rich List.
Adele is already said to be worth £85m (Dominic Lipinski/PA)
The source added: “Adele’s deal with her original label XL expired and we’d an existing relationship with her in America.
“The deal is being worked on by our Columbia label in the US, but is worth £90 million and gives Sony the rights to release her future music exclusively around the world.”
Adele at the Brit Awards (Ian West/PA)
The contract was negotiated by her manager Jonathan Dickins, the newspaper reported.
A source told the paper: “Jonathan’s been putting it together for a couple of years. He was very aware of her worth in the market and stood firm to push for the £90 million.”
Jonathan (centre) with Benji B and Molly Hawkins (David Crotty/AP)
A spokeswoman for Adele declined to comment.
Michael Jackson’s estate still holds the record for the biggest recording contract in history, signed nine months after the singer’s death.
The 250 million US dollar (£164 million) deal with Sony gave the label rights to up to 10 new recordings, back catalogue and franchising.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article