Almost three-quarters of Scots believe Muirfield golf club's ban on women members is "damaging to Scotland's reputation", according to a new poll.
The survey of more than 1,000 Scots also found nearly 80% think women should have the same standing as men in Scottish golf clubs.
The Survation poll was commissioned by campaign group 38 Degrees following the East Lothian club's vote last month against allowing women members, which led to it losing the right to host golf's Open Championship.
Muirfield held the ballot at the end of a two-year consultation on membership, but failed to get the two-thirds majority of its 648 eligible voters required to change the policy.
Of the 616 members who voted, 397, or 64%, voted in favour of admitting women, while 219, or 36%, voted against.
Maggie Chao, 38 Degrees' spokeswoman, said: "The majority of Muirfield's members actually voted to admit female members.
"As this poll makes clear, the overwhelming majority of Scots believe that women should have the same standing as men in all of Scotland's golf clubs.
"This poll gives the club an opportunity to revisit their decision and bring their membership policy into line with what most Scots - and most of their members - want."
High-profile figures have spoken out on the issue, with Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon describing the result as ''indefensible'', Prime Minister David Cameron saying it was ''outdated'' and 2014 Open Championship winner Rory McIlroy calling on the club to "see sense".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel