MOST private schools are ignoring “restrictive” reforms introduced in the state sector that delay the beginning of formal exams, an official has said.

John Edward, director of the Scottish Council of Independent Schools (SCIS), said it was routine for independent pupils to choose exam subjects in S2 rather than S3.

One of the underlying philosophies of Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) is the introduction of a broad general education in the first three years of secondary to allow pupils to develop their learning without the immediate pressure of exams.

Read more: Scots parents 'turning their back' on state schools because of new curriculum, says head

Despite this many state schools are still allowing pupils to make exam choices before the end of third year because they believe it gives them an appropriate focus and challenge for their learning. It also makes it easier for pupils to sit more qualifications.

However, inspectors have now launched a clampdown on schools that are ignoring the so-called broad general education.

Mr Edward said: “The view of private schools generally is that they adhere to their own curricula and there will not be a standard approach. If pupils are ready for exams earlier then they will take them earlier.

The Herald:

“I don’t know of any private school that has adopted the broad general education. I don’t think they would be as restrictive as that. I think they might have a general sense of when pupils would start exams, but I don’t think they would bring the drawbridge down at one stage or another.

“I know of children who are in S2 at the moment who are making subject choices with national qualifications in mind and that is not unusual in the private sector.”

Read more: Revealed - MSPs five times more likely to be privately educated than average Scot

Mr Edward’s comments came after Cameron Wyllie, principal of George Heriot’s School, in Edinburgh, said increasing numbers of families coming from comprehensive schools to the private sector blamed their decision on a lack of challenge for able pupils under CfE.

Speaking in a personal capacity, he said: “This policy that children should continue with a broad education into S3 rather than selecting seven or eight subjects to study for two years has always been deeply perplexing to me.

“My first concrete suggestion would be that the policy of broad general education in S3 should be dropped. I think this would be very attractive to informed parents... and would improve standards in literacy and numeracy since pupils would spend more time on English and maths.”

The Herald:

A spokesman for the Educational Institute of Scotland teaching union said education could offer challenge and direction without the pursuit of exams.

Eileen Prior, executive director of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council, said the broad general education should not be “written off”.

She said: “We have to ask about the purpose of education. It is surely about much more than simply preparing young people to sit and pass exams.

Read more: Kelvinside Academy unveils 'youngest headteacher in UK independent sector' as new rector

“Employers tell us often about the attributes they are looking for such as team working, communication, collaboration, problem solving and entrepreneurship and these are part of the reason the broad general education has been supported in principle by many parents.”