IN-PATIENT children's services should be retained at a Scottish hospital despite patient safety issues including concerns about the treatment of premature babies.
An expert review has concluded that services should remain on two sites in Lothian - St John’s Hospital (SJH) and the Royal Hospital for Sick Children (RHSC).
The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health was commissioned to carry out an investigation into children’s wards at several NHS Lothian hospitals in response to a staff shortage which led to the temporary closure of the children’s ward at St John’s in Livingston in the summer of 2015.
There have long been fears that the children’s ward at St John’s could face closure because of staffing difficulties.
It's newly published report highlights concerns from midwives working at St John’s neonatal unit who felt they were sometimes "leading resuscitation" rather than supporting it.
"The Review team heard mixed reports about clinical safety concerns on the St John’s neonatal unit particularly relating to resuscitation and consultants ‘acting down’ on the out of hours rota," the report said.
But the report, which also examines the Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, and Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, says that St John’s medical team felt there were “no safety issues” and were “confident” nurses could “handle a 23-week infant” until further expertise arrived.
The report also says an NHS Lothian management team expressed concern about "a number of incidents relating to resuscitation" in paediatric services, which deals with the medical care of children, in the weeks prior to the review team’s visit.
"These were reportedly attributed to inadequate training and maintenance of competencies compounded by overworked staff with minimal backup," said the report.
The review report told of of a discussion in April which indicated that there was "not an open culture of reporting with staff feeling ‘guilty’ to report and lack of clarity over which incidents required logging" Nurses believed that practice in the neonatal unit was "variable" due to lack of confidence in some medical staff.
The report also stated that the governance arrangements across NHS and within each hospital were "not consistent" and "seemed to lack openness" and this appeared to affect staff morale.
Despite this, the review team says staff at St John's were dedicated "despite serious staff shortages".
NHS board members are being asked to consider a staffing model at St John's based on consultants being resident in the hospital overnight and would see them carrying out occasional overnight shifts to provide an on-site senior presence.
It is suggested in the short-term the children’s ward at St John’s Hospital would be a 24-hour unit but should not admit children overnight when consultants are not present. Out of hours cover would be provided by a mixture of advanced practice nurses and medical staff, with a non-resident consultant on-call from home.
NHS Lothian board members will meet next Wednesday to agree what actions should be taken from the many recommendations included in the 80-page report to "ensure a safe, effective and sustainable service for children of Lothian".
Lothian Labour MSP Neil Findlay, who has just been appointed convener of the Scottish Parliament’s health and sport committee said: "This is a fantastic victory for the community campaign. We said from the beginning that it would be unacceptable for any closure or downgrade of the ward at St Johns and we have been successful in defending these services.
"There are however huge issues relating the services being provided and we have to ensure that the concerns raised in the Royal college report are addressed - but today is a victory for people power and I want to thank everyone who supported the campaign.
Jim Crombie, chief officer of acute services at NHS Lothian, said: “I want to ensure that we can deliver the safest services for children across Lothian which is why we commissioned the experts at the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health to carry out an independent review."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here