Mike Ashley has suffered another set back in his battle with Rangers after a civil judge ruled the Newcastle United owner has to pay the SFA's legal bills.
The Sports Direct supremo's lawyers were told on Thursday that their client will have to pay the footballing watchdog's and Dave King's costs.
The entrepreneur had abandoned a judicial review at Edinburgh's Court of Session.
Read more: Mike Ashley could be forced to pay legal bills of Rangers chairman Dave King and the SFA
He had wanted judge Lord Bannatyne to overturn the SFA's decision to class Rangers chairman Dave King as a "fit and proper person" to be involved in football. However, he dropped the action in April 2016 shortly after receiving information about Mr King's finances.
The information had been used by the SFA in their May 2015 deliberations and Mr Ashley's decision to stop the action came on the first day of proceedings.
Ashley's legal team argued that he shouldn't have need to pay the football watchdog's costs.
He told the hearing that if Mr Ashley had been given the information at an earlier stage, he would not have gone to the Court of Session.
However, Lord Bannatyne disagreed with the argument and ruled that Mike Ashley should meet the costs incurred by the action.
The latest decision comes just weeks after fellow Court of Session judge Lord Brodie ruled the SFA were correct to fine Mike Ashley for breaking ownership rules.
Read more: Mike Ashley could be forced to pay legal bills of Rangers chairman Dave King and the SFA
Mr Ashley, who owns an 8.92 per cent stake in Rangers, was fined £1,000 for his involvement with Rangers and Newcastle United.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel