AN inner city woodland at the centre of a long-running battle between residents and Scotland's largest council cannot be designated for housing, ministers have said.
In a major victory for the campaign to preserve the space in Glasgow's west end, the Scottish Government has ruled against the city council's plans to have the land set aside for housing.
READ MORE: Picturesque village Gullane 'under threat' from development
The move comes around a month before an expected public inquiry into whether the council can proceed with its attempts to sell the North Kelvin Meadow to developers for a controversial housing plan.
The Scottish Government's Reporter said the land at Clouston Street was "a highly valued open space which is well used and maintained by the local community, and which should continue to be safeguarded for that purpose". The Reporter added that its development for housing would be "in conflict with planning policies which seek to protect such areas".
READ MORE: Picturesque village Gullane 'under threat' from development
Glasgow City Council has described the decision as "disappointing and surprising" but added that it would have no bearing on the forthcoming assessment of the sale of the plot for 90 properties.
But campaigners, who have been backed by high-profile figures including Frankie Boyle, leading children’s author Julia Donaldson and Children’s Commissioner for Scotland Tam Baillie, said they believed that given the move to move against the wood being designated a housing zone the Reporter looking at the specific application for the site was likely to come to the same conclusion.
READ MORE: Picturesque village Gullane 'under threat' from development
On its social media site, the Children's Wood campaign described the move as "significant news and brilliant".
It added: "We've waited a very long time for this and it’s a great result. Well done all that have been campaigning and helping the land over the years.
"In short, you'd expect both reporters to come to the same conclusion, as they both will be looking at the same facts. We and others will be making as strong a case as ever at the forthcoming hearing."
The Government Reporter had been responding to objections to the council's third instalment of its City Plan, essentially its blueprint for development over the next few years.
READ MORE: Picturesque village Gullane 'under threat' from development
The land had been zoned for housing about a decade ago, in the first version of the City Plan, but later altered. The council had wanted it reverted back to land designated for development.
In summing up, the Reporter said: "Even in wet weather, when I conducted my site inspection, people were walking dogs and families were using the play space.
"The site is clearly an area that is valued and looked after by the local community. The majority of representations and a petition seek to retain the site as open greenspace for the community.
"I recognise that the development of this site for housing would make a contribution towards meeting the shortfall in the provision of land for new housing in the city.
"However, the land at Clouston Street is a highly valued open space which is well used and maintained by the local community, and which should continue to be safeguarded for that purpose. Its development for housing would be in conflict with planning policies which seek to protect such areas."
Cllr George Redmond, the political head for jobs, business and investment at the authority, said: “We appreciate the scrutiny the Reporters have given to key matters.
"However, the assessment of the Clouston Street site is disappointing and surprising, particularly in the broader context of the Reporters’ call for more housing in Glasgow and the potential for development to deliver further investment in community facilities in this neighbourhood.
"Despite this, we welcome the Reporter’s recognition that the Plan Examination is an independent process that should not have a bearing on the processing of the application currently under review at Clouston Street.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel