DOWNING Street has insisted the “last thing” Scotland needs is another divisive independence referendum but did not rule out the UK Government facilitating one.
It claimed the reasons for the nation staying part of the UK were as strong now as they were in September 2014.
In the past, David Cameron has been adamant that the vote of 18 months ago would stand for a generation and made clear there would not be a second poll on Scottish independence. Westminster remains the constitutional authority concerning referendums.
However, during the EU referendum campaign the Prime Minister said he was “worried” about the prospect of a second Scottish independence poll and the break-up of Britain; his aides later suggested he was expressing his own view but one that had been widely expressed by others.
When asked - in light of Nicola Sturgeon’s declaration that a second independence referendum was now “highly likely” following the Brexit vote - would Mr Cameron facilitate one, his spokeswoman said: “The Prime Minister’s view has not changed. There was a legal, fair and decisive referendum nearly two years ago.
“The reasons for Scotland to be in the UK are as strong now as they were 18 months ago. What we all need to do is to focus on getting the best deal for Scotland and the UK in these negotiations. The last thing that Scotland needs now is a divisive referendum.”
But when asked if that meant Mr Cameron would refuse to facilitate any demand from the SNP Government to hold a second poll, the spokeswoman said: “It’s not on the table right now. What is on the table right now is the decision of the UK to leave the EU and how best to secure interests as part of that and that’s what we should be focusing on.”
When it was pointed out that the First Minister had in terms said the issue of a second independence poll was “very much on the table” - her cabinet has approved a plan to start drawing up the necessary legislation to hold another referendum - the spokeswoman replied: “There is no formal proposal request on the table.”
Earlier, David Mundell suggested the UK Government would facilitate a second independence poll when he said: "Could there be another referendum? Of course there could, that's a process issue. Should there be another referendum? That's a quite different issue and there should not be another independence referendum."
The Scottish Secretary accused Ms Sturgeon of "opportunism" to further the "independence agenda".
Meantime, the PM’s spokeswoman was asked about whether or not the Scottish Parliament had the ability to veto Brexit and replied: “The position is clear; foreign policy is a reserved matter and this was a decision taken by the United Kingdom.”
Asked about Ms Sturgeon’s intention to establish “immediate discussions” with Brussels to “protect Scotland’s place in the EU,” the spokeswoman said: “That’s a matter for them. There is a Scotland Office in Brussels that has existed for a number of years.”
Elsewhere, senior Conservative backbencher David Davis, made clear he did not think Scottish voters would back independence in a second referendum.
He told the RT TV channel: “The suggestion that the Scots will vote to leave, well, we’d be the first country in history that voted to create a bankrupt state because with the oil price where it is they depend on the United Kingdom to support them and the Scots are too smart to vote for that.”
The Yorkshire MP added: “If the SNP do that[held another referendum], that means they’ll lose two referendums inside five years;that would be the end of any independence arguments for a century.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel