TONY Blair faces a “judicial or political reckoning,” Alex Salmond has insisted, raising the prospect that the former prime minister could be tried for war crimes in the Scottish courts.
Ahead of the eagerly-awaited publication of the £10 million, 2.6m word report by the Chilcot Inquiry on Wednesday, the former First Minister stressed how he and other MPs believed evidence existed for "action to be taken" against Mr Blair.
He acknowledged that this would be difficult because the “most obvious crime” with which the former Labour leader could be charged was one of organising a "war of aggression" but Mr Salmond pointed out that the International Criminal Court did not as yet have jurisdiction over that.
"The domestic courts, at least in England,” explained the SNP’s foreign affairs spokesman, have chosen not to pursue crimes which were international.” But he then noted: “Incidentally, that has not been tested in Scotland."
The MP for Gordon, who unsuccessfully sought to impeach Mr Blair over the Iraq war in 2004, added: "One way or another, there are many MPs across the political parties, who are absolutely determined, that account has to be held to." Some want the former premier to be stripped of his role as a privy counsellor and the title of “right honourable” that goes with it.
Mr Salmond declared: “You cannot have a situation where this country blunders into an illegal war with the appalling consequences and at the end of the day there isn't a reckoning. There has to be a judicial or political reckoning for it."
Labour's John McDonnell refused to rule out calling for Mr Blair to be tried for war crimes over Iraq.
The shadow chancellor did not disagree with the suggestion, made over the weekend, that he and Jeremy Corbyn, one of the keenest critics of the Iraq war, would seek to "crucify" the former leader for "being a war criminal" when the report is published.
When asked if he thought the former party leader might have questions to answer in the international court, Mr McDonnell replied: "Nobody can comment on this until we see the report itself and I'm hoping that it will be thorough and for me the importance is not Tony Blair or any individuals, it's about the processes, so we never ever get into this tragic, tragic mess again with such loss of life."
Professor Robert Black QC, one of Scotland’s foremost advocates, who was one of the architects of the Lockerbie trial, said: “Since Tony Blair's actions over Iraq were taken while he was Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, it is certainly the case that, if he committed any criminal offences, Scottish courts just as much as English courts would have jurisdiction to try him.
“But I have to say, I'm having difficulty trying to figure out what the charges under Scots or English law would be,” he added.
Rose Gentle from Glasgow, whose 19-year-old son Gordon, a Royal Highland Fusilier, died in a roadside bomb attack while on patrol in Basra in 2004, said: “Whatever comes out in the inquiry, if he[Tony Blair] has lied and is held responsible for it, then he should be taken to court.”
She added: “I don’t see why it should just be England; Scottish families have lost someone as well. If anything does come out, then it should be taken further and if it’s got to be done in the Scottish courts, then it should be done because there are Scottish families affected.”
The families of the fallen have already indicated they will consider using the findings of the Chilcot inquiry to sue the former PM, ex-ministers and generals for failing in their public duties.
Mr Blair, when asked about the Iraq report, declined to comment, saying only: “Wednesday is the time the report is published. I have said many times over these past years I will wait for the report and then I will make my views known and express myself fully and properly.”
But Mr Salmond took the former PM to task, saying his current coyness on the subject did “not stop him talking to CNN last October when he apologised for other people’s action; the famous non-apology apology...”
He added the reason why Mr Corbyn and others regarded Mr Blair as a war criminal was clear: “179 British war dead, 150,000 immediate dead from the Iraq conflict, a Middle East in flames, the world faced with an existential crisis on terrorism.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel