Health professionals have urged judges at Scotland's highest civil court to make a decision on minimum pricing for alcohol "wisely and swiftly".
The group Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP) made the plea as a legal challenge on the controversial policy was due to return to the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Medics have long expressed their support for the policy, which was approved by the Scottish Parliament in 2012.
But the legislation, which would introduce a minimum unit price (MUP) of 50p for alcohol, has been challenged by the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) and other European wine and spirits producers who claim it breaches European law.
SHAAP director Eric Carlin said the case is returning to court at a time when a new study provides "important additional support for the Scottish Government's case".
A post by Dr Adrianna Andreangeli, a lecturer in competition law at Edinburgh University, said it is "now up to the Scottish Court of Session to be 'courageous' and consider whether this is the time to move away from the 'safety' of fiscal measures to embrace the 'brave new world' of price controls as tools of 'genuine' public interest regulation".
The European Court of Justice has already ruled minimum pricing would breach European Union law if alternative tax measures could be introduced, and it referred the case back to the Edinburgh court.
Dr Andreangeli argued the experience of similar measures in Canada had shown these could be effective as a way of reducing "harmful alcohol demand", as opposed to more generalised tax increases.
Mr Carlin said: "The MUP legislation has not been implemented because of the ongoing legal challenge by global producers, led by the SWA, prioritising profits over health. This new research provides important additional support for the Scottish Government's case.
"Twenty-two people die every week in Scotland because of alcohol. The Scottish medical professions have to deal with the harms caused by cheap, strong alcohol, sold for as little as 18p per unit, which devastates the lives of individuals, families and communities.
"I hope that the Court of Session will make its decision, in favour of MUP, wisely and swiftly, in the interests of the people, reducing the burden on GPs, hospital and emergency services and the distress and harms caused to Scottish people."
Public Health Minister Aileen Campbell said: "The Scottish Government remains committed to MUP and this research adds to the wealth of evidence which supports the policy.
"We believe that MUP is the most effective pricing measure to tackle the high-strength, low-cost alcohol that causes so much damage in our communities."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel