THE MP challenging Jeremy Corbyn for the Labour leadership has been criticised for his stance on the Barnett Formula after it emerged he said the funding deal had “seen its day”.
Owen Smith also said during a debate at Westminster that he backed a “fairer” funding package across the UK.
SNP MSP James Dornan said the comments were “deeply disturbing".
Corbyn is facing a leadership contest after dozens of his parliamentary colleagues said they had no confidence in his ability to win a general election
Smith, an MP for a Welsh constituency since 2010, has positioned himself as a soft-left candidate and is perceived to be the underdog in the race.
However, both candidates are facing questions about the Barnett Formula, which has allowed Scotland to build up a sizeable per-head spending advantage over English regions.
Dave Anderson, a Corbyn ally and Shadow Scotland Secretary, was revealed to have made critical remarks about the funding scheme in the past.
Smith, who is expected to receive the support of a majority of Labour MSPs, can also be revealed as a Barnett sceptic.
In a debate in 2011, he said that any move to a needs-based funding system – Barnett is focused on population size – would be “very difficult”.
However, he said: “I, too, would be "happier" if we went to a needs-based formula; I will concede that much.
He added: “I simply add that at last we agree across this House that a fairer funding formula ought to be pursued and that Barnett has seen its day. I therefore commend the Government for considering how we might do something important about it in the future.”
And in January 2014, when asked about the Barnett Formula on TV programme Sharp End, Smith said:
“We should be pledging to look at funding across the UK.”
He also said: “We do need to review our funding mechanisms.”
However, weeks later, he wrote a piece praising the impact of the formula on Wales: “Though Barnett may be flawed, it still provides us with £112 for every £100 of English public spending.”
Although the Scottish Parliament is to gain substantial extra tax powers from April next year, a large chunk of Holyrood’s budget will still be determined by the formula. Scrapping Barnett with a needs-based system could potentially result in cuts to the Parliament’s budget.
Dornan said: “It is deeply disturbing that senior Westminster figures continue to raise the spectre of getting rid of the Barnett formula - contrary to all promises made to Scotland during the referendum. This isn’t just a few right-wing Tory backbenchers – but now a series of prominent figures on both Labour and Tory front benches, including Labour's Shadow Scottish Secretary and one of their leadership candidates.
“And given that we know Kezia Dugdale will likely be backing Owen Smith for the Labour leadership, she now needs to come clean and admit whether she agrees with his plans to cut Scotland’s budget."
Smith’s press team could not be reached.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel