Historian Dominic Sandbrook has argued that the 1980s would have been the same even if Margaret Thatcher had fallen under a bus.
The author, who has previously examined the 1960s in his book White Heat and the 1970s in books including State Of Emergency and Mad As Hell, has now turned his attention to the 1980s for a new documentary series.
How far did Margaret Thatcher affect the 80s? (PA)
Writing in the Radio Times, he explained: “Just as we so often misremember the ’60s, so I think we’ve been getting the ’80s wrong, too.”
The decade will be the subject of The 80s With Dominic Sandbrook, starting on Thursday August 4 on BBC 2 at 9pm.
The academic and TV presenter, who is a visiting professor at King’s College London, said: “No other prime minister has ever been so closely associated with the way we remember a particular decade.
Historian Dominic Sandbrook is examining the 80s (Alec Webb/BBC)
“It would be easy to talk about the ’60s without mentioning Harold Wilson, the ’90s without John Major.
“But the ’80s without Thatcher? Unthinkable. Whether you love or loathe her, she dominates the story.”
However, Mrs Thatcher did not have the impact people thought she did, Sandbrook, 41, has argued.
The 80s with Dominic Sandbrook will air in August (Louis Caulfield/BBC)
“I think that if Thatcher had fallen under a bus in 1979, the story of ’80s Britain would have been much less different than we think,” he said.
“Mass unemployment, conflict in the coal mines, even wine bars and shoulder pads were probably all coming anyway.
“The truth is that the Iron Lady has become a convenient get-out, a way for the rest of us to pretend we live in a country that somebody else made.”
This week’s Radio Times is on sale now.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article