Bill Cosby has dropped a lawsuit demanding that the accuser in his sex assault criminal case repay the money from their confidential 2006 court settlement.
The veteran actor and entertainer had sued Andrea Constand for breach of contract for speaking to police who reopened the criminal investigation last year.
His lawyers argued that her police statements, along with two tweets and brief comments to a Toronto newspaper, broke the confidentiality clause.
Bill Cosby (Phelan M. Ebenhack/AP)
A judge upheld her right to talk to police but said Cosby could pursue the other issues. However Cosby dropped the suit entirely on Thursday, a week after he switched law firms for the second time in about a year.
“With a court validation of his ability to proceed … Mr Cosby has today stepped away from that suit and will instead focus his efforts on defending himself against the claims that have been lodged against him,” his lawyer said in a statement.
The swirl of litigation surrounding Cosby, 79, includes the felony sexual-assault case involving Ms Constand and a string of defamation lawsuits filed by women who said they were branded liars when Cosby or his agents denied their similar claims.
Bill Cosby (Michael Bryant/AP/PA)
Ms Constand’s lawyers called the lawsuit Cosby filed against their client “a blatant attempt at intimidation”. They had also been named as defendants, along with Ms Constand’s mother.
“The dismissal is a victory for all victims,” lawyer Dolores Troiani said.
Bill Cosby departs the Montgomery County Courthouse earlier this year (Matt Rourke/AP)
No trial date has been set for Cosby’s felony sex-assault trial. He is accused of drugging and molesting Ms Constand at his home near Philadelphia in 2004.
Ms Constand sued him in 2005 after prosecutors at the time declined to file charges. The criminal case was reopened after other accusers came forward and Cosby’s deposition in the civil suit was released.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article