Labour leadership challenger Owen Smith has been called on to condemn any attempt to split the party if Jeremy Corbyn retains the top job.
Shadow chancellor John McDonnell expressed concern at reports in the Daily Telegraph that some MPs opposed to Mr Corbyn are preparing to elect their own leader and launch a legal battle for the party's name and assets if Mr Smith loses the membership ballot election.
Read more: Jeremy Corbyn insists Labour under his leadership could unite and win snap general election
"The democratic process is fundamental to Labour Party values and all candidates must commit to respecting the outcome of this election.
"We call on Owen Smith to condemn the minority of MPs supporting his campaign who are threatening to subvert the outcome of this election and cause enormous damage to the Labour Party," Mr McDonnell said.
Responding to the intervention, Mr Smith said he would "not indulge in gossip".
"This leadership process is now entirely about Labour members and supporters. We have a one member, one vote system, so MPs will have the same amount of say as all Labour members - exactly as it should be," he said.
Read more: Voters are fed up with the Tweedledee-Tweedledum politics of the Westminster elite
The spat came as Mr Smith takes his battle to topple Mr Corbyn into "enemy territory" with a campaign push in Liverpool.
With the Smith camp seeing the city as a Corbyn stronghold, they want the move to underline the would-be leader's aim to try to reunite the party around him.
The bid comes as Mr Corbyn holds rallies in Hull and Leeds as the two men slug it out for the Labour crown through the summer before the winner is declared at the end of September.
The pitches came as former shadow cabinet member Angela Eagle warned Labour MPs to moderate their language after Mr Smith was forced to apologise for controversial comments aimed at Prime Minister Theresa May.
Read more: Iain Macwhirter: Why Labour control-freaks fear Corbynites
Mr Smith, who toppled Ms Eagle as the "unity" candidate tasked with ousting Mr Corbyn as Labour leader by dissenting MPs, drew widespread criticism for saying he wanted to "smash" Mrs May "back on her heels".
Ms Eagle told The Guardian: "He should have, and has, apologised. As someone that has heard cruel words spoken about me, I know that language matters. And we've all got a responsibility to be sensitive with our use of language.
"Owen has shown a capacity to recognise, and apologise for, insensitivity, and that's important."
Ms Eagle said it was "extraordinarily disingenuous" for Mr Corbyn's team to "cloak Jeremy in the mantle of feminism by saying that we have to be sensitive about our use of language, especially around women MPs".
She insisted she was not taking it personally that more anti-Corbyn MPs had backed Mr Smith over her as the best placed candidate to dislodge the leader.
The former shadow business secretary said she was trying not to dwell on threats received since she became the first to challenge for the leadership.
"I don't want to dwell on it, partially because if I dwell on it too much, or I talk about it too much, I just get a load more," she said.
Mr Smith initially refused to apologise for his comments regarding Mrs May, but was forced to do so after the controversy mounted.
The visit to Liverpool by Mr Smith sees him attending the city's gay pride celebrations, and meeting party members at a special event.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel