ALMOST half of Britons doubt whether the Conservative Government will meet its controversial immigration target even after the UK has left the European Union, according to a survey for the British Future think-tank.
The first official immigration figures since the Brexit vote will be published this morning.
David Cameron, the former Prime Minister, set the target of getting net migration to below 100,000 a year “no ifs no buts”. However, the current figure is more than 300,000.
Sunder Katwala, director of the think-tank, said: "Public trust in governments' competence to manage immigration - including meeting its own targets - is at rock bottom."
Read more: Poll - Brexit 'has not boosted the cause of Scottish independence'
Meantime, the Institute for Public Policy Research claimed in a separate report that the NHS "would collapse" without workers from the European Union, and called for them to be offered automatic citizenship as part of efforts to head off a "brain drain".
Britain is expected to seek to introduce controls on free movement rules following the referendum outcome but details of the system have yet to be outlined.
A poll of more than 2,000 adults for British Future examined attitudes regarding the aim to reduce net migration to five figures.
It found some 44 per cent thought it unlikely the UK Government would meet its target in the next five years as opposed to 37 per cent, who said it was likely.
Read more: Poll - Brexit 'has not boosted the cause of Scottish independence'
The report also said:
*12 per cent of people would like to see a reduction in the numbers of highly skilled workers migrating to Britain while 46 per cent would like to see more arriving;
*people were "less positive" about low-skilled workers moving to the UK with 38 per cent happy for numbers to stay the same or increase but 62 per cent said they preferred a reduction.
"The Brexit shake-up could be an opportunity to get immigration policy right - to restore trust in a system that works, and public consent for the immigration that we have," said Mr Katwala.
The IPPR paper cited figures suggesting there were currently around 55,000 EU nationals working in the English NHS and that one in 10 of the UK's registered doctors was an EU national.
"Without them, the NHS would collapse," the report said, recommending that the Government "makes a particularly generous citizenship" offer to NHS workers.
Read more: Poll - Brexit 'has not boosted the cause of Scottish independence'
It said all EU nationals who work for, or as locums in, the NHS should be eligible to apply for British citizenship.
The study called for a waiver of fees, English language and "life in the UK" tests, and residency requirements for all staff employed in public healthcare.
IPPR research fellow Chris Murray said: "Britain can ill afford to lose the talents of many EU migrants who have made Britain their home.
"EU migrants who are already here should get indefinite leave to remain. In particular, EU NHS workers should get the automatic right to citizenship. If they left, it would be a crisis for the NHS."
The status of more than three million EU migrants already in Britain came under scrutiny after the Brexit vote.
The Government has said it "fully expects" that the legal status of EU migrants living in this country will be "properly protected" when the UK leaves.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel