The pressure on Mike Ashley to shake up corporate governance and address concerns over working practices at Sports Direct has been ramped up a notch after another shareholder group called for an independent review of how the business is run.
The Investor Forum, consisting of influential investors holding assets worth more than £14 trillion, has urged the retailer to "undertake a wide-reaching independent review of the entire governance practices at the company".
The unprecedented criticism by the Forum comes amid growing shareholder unrest over the power wielded by Mr Ashley, who owns 55% of the group and is deputy executive chairman. And the intervention comes after it was revealed that Sports Direct's accounts fail to disclose that international deliveries are run by Mr Ashley's brother, John.
Read more: Pressure growing for independent review into practices at Sports Direct
Forum director Andy Griffiths said: "It is highly unusual for the Investor Forum to consider it necessary to make public their concerns and recommendations in this way. In prior situations we have always managed to work privately with companies to create effective long-term solutions.
"We do not take this step lightly and, whilst we welcome Sport Direct's move to hold an open day, we still have not received an appropriate level of commitment to respond to investor concerns and, as a result, the usual options have been exhausted."
He added that the business requires "fundamental reform".
Sports Direct is also facing calls from a growing list of investors asking for an independent review into working practices following Mr Ashley's grilling by MPs in June.
Read more: Pressure growing for independent review into practices at Sports Direct
Mr Ashley told MPs from the Business Select Committee that staff were not paid during security searches at the end of their shift, meaning they took home less than the minimum amount required by law.
The Fourm added: "Following Mike Ashley's appearance at the BIS Select Committee, shareholders requested that the board commit to an independent and comprehensive review.
"The Forum was clear that the review would have to be independent, comprehensive and, as recommended by the BIS Committee report, cover all aspects of corporate governance across the business, not only employment practices.
"Governance failings are clearly resulting in declines in operating performance and long- term shareholder value and, given the lack of progress and the broader impact on all stakeholders, the Forum now considers it important to make public its recommendations to the Sports Direct board."
Read more: Pressure growing for independent review into practices at Sports Direct
For its part, Sports Direct has said the findings of a separate review carried out by RPC would be published in the week beginning September 5 and it would conduct a review of its board of directors by next April.
On Wednesday, Sports Direct announced that it will hold an open day for the public on the day of its AGM on September 7, when it is expected to face a barrage of criticism from unions and shareholders.
In another blow for Mr Ashley, Legal & General, the retailer's 11th largest shareholder, has said it intends to vote against the re-election of chairman Keith Hellawell and all non-executive directors, while also supporting the "shareholder requisition resolution on an independent review of labour practices".
In a statement issued on Thursday, the group said: "For the third consecutive year we will be voting against the re-election of the chairman at Sports Direct. We first voted against the chairman in 2014 when the share price performance was still strong, trading at around £7.00. Today it is trading at around £3.08.
"We will also be voting against the re-election of all non-executive directors as we believe that Sports Direct needs a stronger body of independent non-executive directors to ensure the business is run in the interest of all shareholders. We are disappointed that there have been no new non-executive board appointments in the last five years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here