Mary Berry has defended her opposition to deep-fat fryers after her comments sparked indignation from MasterChef judge Gregg Wallace.
Mary, 81, provoked controversy when she told a magazine that “I don’t think any household should have a deep-fat fryer”, while also speaking out against children drinking fizzy drinks.
Gregg responded by saying that the Great British Bake Off veteran’s opposition to the deep-fat fryer is “an attack on our British way of life”.
Gregg Wallace (David Davies/PA Archive/PA Images)
Now Mary has stuck by her comments, telling the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that deep-fat fryers are dangerous because they cause fires as well as being detrimental to health.
“I have never, on any of my programmes, ever used a deep-fat fryer,” she said.
“Nowadays everybody eats in the kitchen, I know we do, and I certainly don’t want the smell of frying while I’m eating.
Mary Berry (Luke MacGregor/PA)
“And so we do have oven chips from time to time when the grandchildren come – give them a treat – but I usually do things in the oven rather than frying. I think it’s unhealthy as well.”
She added: “Years ago I was on a programme – Good Afternoon (with Judith Chalmers) – and we had a fireman in the programme, and he told me that most kitchen fires were caused by deep-fat frying because… most people cook with a pan of fat on top of their cooker, and sometimes they get distracted and there’s a fire.”
Gregg blasted fellow BBC star Berry in the Sun On Saturday, writing: “Our nation was built on chips and spam fritters… I love Mary dearly but this is an attack on our British way of life.”
Mary Berry and Paul Hollywood (PA)
Mary is back on screen with fellow judge Paul Hollywood in the new series of Bake Off as another group of cake-loving hopefuls see whether they can stand the heat of the kitchen.
She said she was very happy to stay at the BBC, following reports that ITV had tried to poach the programme.
“I’m very happy where we have been and I’ve enjoyed the Bake Off and any decision that’s made is not mine,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel