ALMOST one in four patients have complained their condition deteriorated during their stay in a Scottish hospital.
An official survey also revealed one-fifth of patients described suffering problems including bed sores, infections and bad reactions to drugs, while more than one in 10 felt that when their health began to decline, staff did not respond quickly enough.
The survey, conducted on behalf of the Scottish Government, found 90 per cent of patients treated in hospital last year rated their overall care as excellent or good. However, it exposed some key issues, with 23 per cent saying their condition worsened while they were on the wards.
One-quarter of the 17,767 patients who responded said staff did not always treat them with compassion and understanding and 20 per cent said a doctor had spoken in front of them as though they were not there.
A spokesman for charity Age Scotland said it was essential the health service moved to address failings to “ensure the highest standard of dignity in care is being delivered”.
“The Scottish Patient Survey has many results Age Scotland would welcome, but we would hope there is never any complacency when it comes to improving standards,” he said.
“There are also a number of key points made to show that action must be taken to ensure the highest standard of dignity in care is being delivered. In addition, we would hope any issues around varying standards of care depending on which hospital you attend are corrected swiftly.
“We all know the NHS is under great pressure to deliver the excellent service that is does, but no-one should receive a different standard of care depending on your postcode.”
The findings were released on the same day as charity Cancer Research UK said new figures showing thousands of patients waiting longer than six weeks for diagnostic tests were “hugely worrying”.
NHS Scotland data revealed 13,200 patients waited longer than six weeks for a diagnostic test between April and June 2016. It also showed increasing numbers of patients queuing longer than other waiting times targets – including the legally binding pledge to treat people within 12 weeks.
Gregor McNie, the charity’s senior public affairs manager for Scotland, said: “The fact so many patients are waiting longer than six weeks for such a vital test is hugely worrying and simply not good enough. These statistics do show an improvement compared to the last quarter but much more needs to be done, including the speedy allocation of the promised £2 million of Scottish Government funding to alleviate the pressure on diagnostic services.
“Cancer is Scotland’s biggest killer, with half of the population expected to be diagnosed with the disease at some point in their lives. Making sure people have diagnostic tests quickly is a vital part of ensuring earlier diagnosis and prompt treatment for patients, including those who might have cancer.”
The Scottish Inpatient Experience Survey, which is intended to capture experience of hospital care in Scotland between April and September last year, was introduced by the SNP in 2010 and has now been carried out five times.
Overall, the proportion of patients making positive comments has remained the same or improved a little since the last survey was conducted in 2014. Those who thought the condition of the hospital ward itself was good or excellent has increased one per cent to 89 per cent.
However, satisfaction with some aspects of hospital services varies around the country.
Contentment with food quality varied widely. Meals served in Lanarkshire and Greater Glasgow and Clyde received the worst reviews. In Lanarkshire 56 per cent of patients were happy with the food they were served and in NHS GGC the figure was 59 per cent, while in other parts of the country satisfaction with the meals ran as high as 96 per cent.
Some health boards also appeared to be making more progress than others. There were no significant improvements
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel