A FATHER who served a jail term almost two decades ago for seriously injuring his baby son yesterday failed in a Court of Appeal bid to clear his name.
Allen Young, 38, of Wishaw, North Lanarkshire, pleaded guilty in 1999 to seriously hurting the five-week-old by shaking him to stop him from crying.
Young, who lived at the time in Belsize Park, north west London, served a year-long jail term for the grievous bodily harm assault on his son Michael.
However he was back before a court again in 2014 after the death of Michael, 12 years after he was injured.
Young was tried for manslaughter and found not guilty by a jury at Wood Green Crown Court.
Despite admitting he shook Michael, Young’s defence at the manslaughter trial was that other medical issues may have caused the brain damage which killed him.
His acquittal led to an appeal earlier this summer against his original GBH conviction, which he said was “inconsistent” with the not guilty verdict on the manslaughter charge.
Through his lawyers, Young claimed before Court of Appeal judges in London that the jury’s verdict showed he was “wrong” to have pleaded guilty in the first place. But after taking three months to consider the case, top judges returned to court to dismiss Young’s conviction appeal.
Sir Brian Leveson said Young had admitted shaking Michael, who was found with numerous fractures and pleaded guilty on the basis of legal advice at the time.
“The medical evidence was to the effect that the fractures were in all probability caused during the shaking incident,” he said.
“Although it is recognised that Allen Young could not know what injuries he had caused, the contemporaneous fractures would have been at a time when he was responsible for Michael’s welfare.
“With the benefit of advice from leading counsel, the accuracy and propriety of which is not challenged, he entered a plea of guilty to causing serious bodily harm to his five-week old son.”
He continued: “In the light of the evidence available for the first trial, there is no basis for contending that a defence to a charge of inflicting grievous bodily harm would quite probably have succeeded.
“There is thus no basis for treating the plea of guilty as a nullity or the conviction as unsafe.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article