Dungavel became a byword for some of the most frightening aspects of seeking asylum in the UK, refugee groups said as the controversial facility's closure was finally announced.
Another name was "Scotland's shame".
Those who were detained there said it had been built to be a prison “and that is what it was".
Many were taken there during one of the notorious "dawn raids" which prompted a public outcry and furious demonstrations, including by the "Glasgow Girls", a group of pupils from Drumchapel High School angry at the heavy-handed way school their friend had been removed.
Detainees described being transported in vans like criminals to Dungavel, being given ID numbers that had to carried at all times and a regime of constant monitoring by security guards.
Teenagers told of being allowed outside for only one hour each day, their movements within the building restricted in its warren of corridors, which could be sealed off by staff.
Dungavel was described as especially frightening for children.
Its role in detaining the families of failed asylum seekers brought widespread condemnation.
The plight of the Ay family, first raised by The Herald, highlighted the suffering of families caught in the system.
Like most at Dungavel, the Ay family were detained while awaiting a decision over their appeal against deportation.
Yurdigal Ay and her four children, aged between eight and 14, spent more than a year at the centre while outside church leaders, politicians and children's charities condemned their incarceration, arguing it breached international children's rights laws.
They were deported to Germany and later granted asylum following psychiatric reports into the emotional health of two of the family’s daughters as a result of their time in Dungavel.
For more than a decade the immigration centre was the scene of protests by campaigners angry at the government's detention of asylum seekers and their families.
Now the former open prison near Strathaven, once a summer retreat for the Dukes of Hamilton, will finally lose its reputation as the place that "shamed the country".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel