THE incoming UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin said his first mission will be to "shake hands and introduce himself" to staff at the organisation's Nyon headquarters but his tasks will get much harder after that.
Having beaten Dutch rival Michael van Praag by 42 votes to 13 at UEFA's extraordinary congress in Athens, Ceferin certainly has the mandate to tackle the "many problems" he admitted football has, with a resolution to the row over Champions League reforms the most pressing.
Completely unknown outside his native Slovenia until recent weeks, the 48-year-old lawyer built a coalition that combined near total support from Europe's smaller nations, with the heavyweight backing of more traditional powers such as France, Germany and Italy.
Ceferin said: "Obviously people wanted changes and new faces, and you've seen what happened today.
"The big, medium and small associations were all asking for the same things and I might sound naive but I think they believe in my programme."
Responding to those who have suggested he only got the job because of back-room deals and friends in high places like new FIFA president Gianni Infantino, Ceferin said: "I was never behind the scenes. Nobody behind the scenes gets 42 votes.
"I have known Gianni Infantino since I became the president of the Slovenian FA in 2011 and he was secretary general of UEFA.
"If you want to ask me if he supported me, I hope so. I don't know. But if the general secretary thinks I am the best man for the job that is good, because he should know the organisation."
Infantino did not hang around the Grand Resort Lagonissi long enough to ask if that was the basis of his undoubted backing for Ceferin but the room was full of football associations more than happy to say they had voted for the new man because he was a team player who listens.
Both Scottish Football Association chief executive Stewart Regan and his Irish Football Association counterpart Patrick Nelson said they back the unheralded Slovenian because he understands the interests of small nations but had the leadership qualities needed to navigate football away from its recent perils.
The father-of-three, who spoke fluent English throughout, has not provided too many policy details so far but did say he wants to bring in term limits for presidents, clear out all executive committee members who are no longer active in their associations and set up a compliance committee.
But it is the burgeoning class war over access to UEFA's club competitions that will dominate his first few months in the job, with clubs and leagues around Europe threatening to revolt over the deal UEFA hastily arranged with the powerful European Club Association last month.
That settlement agreed to increase the number of guaranteed Champions League group-stage places for Europe's strongest leagues – the Bundesliga, La Liga, Premier League and Serie A – from 11 to 16, half of the total, with radical changes proposed for how the money is allocated. The foremost of those is another that will favour the traditional superpowers, as it gives credit for past performances.
Ceferin said he is unhappy about how this deal was reached and communicated, and said sitting down with the various stakeholders would be his first priority.
Van Praag, however, has completely disowned the deal, despite sitting on the UEFA committee that negotiated it with the ECA, the successor group to the old G-14 collection of big clubs that he once led as president of Dutch side Ajax.
The defeated candidate said the negotiations took place with the ECA effectively holding a gun to UEFA's head in the form of a breakaway super league, a threat that has been made before but this time was more real as talks with US backers were progressing.
The 68-year-old van Praag said the settlement was "negotiated by the UEFA hierarchy and ECA, not by me" but it was him who got ECA chairman Karl-Heinz Rummenigge to take the breakaway threat off the table.
Whether this deal can actually be unpicked is a question nobody has answered, although one senior UEFA source noted the candidate who most publicly wanted to unpick it had just been heavily defeated.
Football Association chief executive Martin Glenn did not go as far as van Praag, the man the FA backed, but said the deal was a "balancing act" between the desires of the big clubs, the more aspirational clubs, broadcasters and commercial partners, and the threat of a breakaway "had some substance to it".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here