A couple who fled to Scotland from Syria fearing their son was dead have told of their longing to hug and kiss him after discovering he is still alive.
Abedul Karou and his wife escaped the war-torn country earlier this year after being told nine-year-old son Mohamed had been killed in a bombing raid.
They later discovered the youngster was alive and launched a plea to be reunited with him.
Speaking to the BBC, Mr Karou, now living in Penicuik, said: "My sister sent me a picture and I saw him and cried, because he has no clothes.
"He's not eating well because there is no food of course. I don't know if he's being covered in the night - how he sleeps, how he eats, how he's living. We don't know.
"It's like every father who is responsible for a family. He wants to see a complete, happy family. He wants to get back after a long day and see a complete family waiting for him. He wants to hug him he wants to kiss him."
The Home Office is looking into Mohamed's case, but are seeking a DNA test to prove he is the couple's son before he can be brought to the UK.
However, there are no test centres in Syria due to the devastating civil war, and the nearest are in neighbouring countries which have closed their borders to Syria.
The family were separated after a bomb blast in Homs, in the west of Syria.
Mr Karou said he was "very happy" when he learned his son was alive but was very worried for him now.
He said his son was in a "miserable situation" and is concerned he may be kidnapped by jihadis and trained by them.
The family's plight has attracted a lot of attention from politicians, who have called on the UK Government to take action.
They were initially offered a Red Cross "chaperone" to take Mohammed across the border but now the Home Office has advised that that is too dangerous.
Midlothian MP Owen Thompson has now written to Home Secretary Amber Rudd to ask her to help after receiving an assurance from Theresa May at Prime Minister's Questions that the case would be looked at.
He said the family had gone through an "unimaginable amount of pain".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel