Scotland will have another independence referendum in roughly two years' time, Alex Salmond has predicted.
The former SNP leader forecast that the vote would take place after talks to keep Scotland in the EU Single Market break down, in comments that will heap pressure on his successor Nicola Sturgeon.
Just weeks ago Ms Sturgeon launched a ‘listening’ exercise designed to help the party win over 'No' voters.
Read more: Kevin McKenna: Two years on, the case for independence has only grown
Two years ago this weekend Scots voted 55 per cent to 45 per cent to stay in the UK.
However, Ms Sturgeon has argued that the UK that Scots decided to remain a part of no longer exists in the wake.
She has asked official servants to begin work on a new referendum bill.
This would be used if ministers "conclude that independence is the best or only way to protect Scotland’s interests” in Europe, she has said.
Mr Salmond said: "I would expect Nicola Sturgeon to fulfil her mandate to keep Scotland within the Single Market place, I would expect her to give Theresa May the opportunity to embed Scotland within the negotiations to enable that to happen.
“And I fully expect, my reading of the situation is, the UK will not be flexible or wise enough to do that, and therefore I expect there’ll be a Scottish referendum in roughly two years’ time.”
Mr Salmond made the comments during an interview with Kremlin-backed TV station Russia Today.
Earlier this year it emerged that other senior SNP politicians were shunning RT amid accusations it slavishly backs Vladimir Putin’s government.
Meanwhile, Scottish Secretary David Mundell will today (SAT) say that an independent Scotland could be forced to cut public spending or pay steep fines to secure EU membership.
Scotland could have to join the euro and the EU's free travel area if it is forced to apply as a new member of the EU, he will say.
And the size of an independent Scotland’s deficit could mean it is forced to cut government spending – or face tough sanctions, including potentially large fines.
He will also question whether countries like Spain, which have their own independence movements, will want to cause trouble if Scotland is forced to apply for EU membership.
The SNP has insisted Scotland would be a 'continuing' member of the EU.
Mr Mundell will say: “The fact is that an independent Scotland’s membership of the EU would be very different from the current arrangements.
“On issues like agriculture and fishing, where UK-wide interests often align, and the clout of the UK has seen policy successes in the past, Scotland would be a lone voice.
"It is, in truth, a very different proposition from that which Remain voters in Scotland backed in June.”
He will also say that the arguments for Scotland remaining in the United Kingdom are stronger than ever.
Read more: Agenda: Should an independent Scotland and Ireland consider a union?
!I do not think that the UK’s vote to leave the European Union does anything substantial to weaken the argument for the UK.
It certainly does not make Scottish independence any more attractive, viable or beneficial a prospect than it was in 2014. Indeed quite the reverse...It is clear that full and unrestricted access to the UK single market is far more important to Scottish businesses than the EU Single Market."
He will also hit out at Ms Sturgeon, calling for a “positive and responsible" approach and attacking her “doom-mongering warning of a ‘lost decade’ “ as “increasingly alarmist”.
He will add: “Objective observers might wonder if the aim is to provide bracingly frank analysis, or to try and talk up the challenges of Brexit in the hope of making Scottish independence seem less of a risk.”
Scottish Brexit minister Michael Russell said: “These comments would be laughable were they not so ridiculous.
“Just a few months ago Mr Mundell, Ruth Davidson and many other Tories warned us of the disastrous consequences of leaving the EU – yet now they try and pretend that the UK offers some sort of stability or certainty for Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel