The British Institute of Human Rights has criticised Scotland over the age of criminal responsibility and the law allowing a defence of "justifiable assault" for parents who hit their children.
The organisation describes this as degrading treatment and adds that holding children criminally responsible from the age of eight is "internationally unacceptable".
However the Scottish Government, along with the Welsh Assembly, is praised for having a more supportive attitude to human rights and international obligations under such treaties as the Convention on the Rights of the Child than the UK Government, which intends to abolish the Human Rights Act and replace it with a UK Bill of Rights.
The Scottish Government is also currently consulting on a planned increase in the age of criminal responsibility.
The report from the BIHR is a shadow report - intended to accompany and critique the UK Government's own report on progress, which UN member countries are required to submit every four and a half years.
It was produced with input from more than 175 charities and other civil society organisations, and claims that the UK has failed to fully meet 81 out of 85 recommendations made by the UN in 2012 to improve human rights protections in Britain.
It said the vast majority of recommendations covering areas such as children's rights, violence against women, discrimination and criminal justice had not been met.
In some areas, such as adequate standard of living, the situation has even got worse, according to the report which says government cuts to welfare and legal aid reforms were among the key factors putting the human rights of British people at risk.
The planned scrapping of the Human Rights Act will lead to less protection of human rights, the report says, expressing little faith in the concept of a British Bill of Rights.
Stephen Bowen, Chief Executive of BIHR said most of the report's recommendations were aimed at the UK Government but there were also lessons for the Scottish Government. "The UK Government needs to listen, not just to the United Nations but to the voices of the huge range of organisations closer to home that have shared their serious concerns with the British Institute of Human Rights," he said.
"They are troubled the Government is taking the UK towards further isolationism and disregarding the United Nations, worsening the situation with welfare and legal aid cuts, and wanting to scrap the Human Rights Act, weakening its accountability for our rights at home as well as internationally."
Scottish charities including the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO), HIV Scotland, Children in Scotland and Alzheimer's Scotland were among those which helped to draw up the report.
Ruchir Shah, policy officer at SCVO said the criticisms of Scottish policy were mostly technicalities, and added: "We wanted to make sure the report reflected the wider picture in the devolved nations. There is a pretty aggressive approach to human rights by the present UK Government. The way in which the Scottish Government is approaching human rights is a lot more progressive."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel