A failure to publish a Civil Service briefing paper outlining the negative implications of Brexit on Northern Ireland ahead of the EU referendum could represent a breach of Stormont's ministerial code, the Assembly has heard.
Ulster Unionist leader Mike Nesbitt asked Stormont's Speaker to consider whether the non-publication of the briefing document, which detailed a series of negative economic consequences for Northern Ireland if the UK left the European Union, breached the code on openness.
Mr Nesbitt said the code stated that information should be restricted only when it was in the public interest to do so.
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon insists there is no mandate for a hard Brexit
"I suggest that it was in the public interest for this document to be published," he said.
The leader of Stormont's biggest Opposition party also asked Speaker Robin Newton to examine the official report of Assembly proceedings to assess whether the House had been misled on the extent of Executive contingency planning for a Brexit vote.
Mr Newton said he would pursue the latter request but pointed out that matters relating to the sharing of Executive information were outside his responsibilities.
The paper, referred to as a "preliminary analysis" of a UK exit, was compiled in May 2015 but only released into the public domain after June's referendum vote, and then only in response to Freedom of Information (FoI) requests.
It was also not circulated among the Executive's smaller parties prior to the vote.
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon insists there is no mandate for a hard Brexit
The document was published this week by investigative news website The Detail.
The 15-page paper drawn up by the European Policy and Co-ordination Unit in the Office of First Minister and Deputy First Minister (since re-named The Executive Office) listed more than 20 ways which an EU exit could hit Northern Ireland's economy.
The DUP campaigned for Brexit in the referendum while Sinn Fein backed a remain vote.
Questioned why the paper was not made public, the DUP said it was not common practice to publish internal scenario planning documents.
"Working papers are commonly circulated amongst officials as part of the machinery of government," said a party spokesman.
He said the paper had also not examined potential advantages of leaving the EU.
Read more: Nicola Sturgeon insists there is no mandate for a hard Brexit
"Such an obvious omission renders the document of only limited use," he added.
Suggesting he favoured publishing the document, Sinn Fein Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness stressed that the sign-off of both main parties was needed to release such a paper.
In Northern Ireland, 56% of voters backed the UK remaining with the EU.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel