A star so strange it has sparked speculation about intelligent aliens is proving even more baffling to scientists.
Last year astronomers discovered that the star known as KIC 8462852 in the constellation Cygnus was sporadically dimming in a way that could not easily be explained.
Theories have ranged from an unusually large group of comets orbiting the star to a megastructure built by super-advanced aliens.
Now a new study from the Carnegie Institution in Washington DC, US, has deepened the mystery.
Further analysis of observations by the Kepler space telescope show that as well as displaying rapid brightness changes, the star has faded slowly and steadily over a period of four years.
Stars can appear dim if solid objects such as planets or dust clouds pass in front of them, but the erratic pattern shown by KIC 8462852 is unlike anything seen before.
When scientists conducted a detailed investigation of the steady fading data they were amazed to find that the star had dimmed by 2% in just six months while being watched by Kepler.
Astronomer Dr Ben Montet said: "The steady brightness change in KIC 8462852 is pretty astounding. Our highly accurate measurements over four years demonstrate that the star really is getting fainter with time. It is unprecedented for this type of star to slowly fade for years, and we don't see anything else like it in the Kepler data."
The Carnegie team believe the best explanation for the sudden dimming might be a collision or breakup of a planet or comet in the star's system, creating a short-term cloud of dust and debris.
However this would not account for the longer-term dimming observed during the first three years of the Kepler observations and also suggested by measurements dating back to the 19th century.
The research has been accepted for publication by The Astrophysical Journal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here