GOVERNMENT-commissioned research on fracking has been delayed until after the SNP conference, angering critics in the party who want to debate the controversial issue.
Ministers said last year that six expert reports on the safety and science of the gas extraction technology would be published by “summer 2016”.
The First Minister said last month they were due out “over the next few weeks", followed by a public consultation on fracking, which involves pumping pressurised water and chemicals into shale beds to release gas, something critics say risks pollution and worsens climate change.
Read more: Jeremy Corbyn 'might not campaign in crunch by-election while in Glasgow'
Now government sources have told the Herald the reports are not scheduled to appear this week or over the two-week Holyrood recess that runs until October 23.
That puts their publication beyond the SNP annual conference in mid-October, where there will be a debate on energy, as well as scope for topical resolutions.
The reports cover the impact of fracking on the economy, seismic activity, climate change, transport and decommissioning.
Health Protection Scotland is also carrying out a public health assessment.
It is understood a factor in the delay has been one of the experts being replaced.
Read more: Jeremy Corbyn 'might not campaign in crunch by-election while in Glasgow'
In July 2014, an Independent Expert Scientific Panel commissioned by the SNP government said hydraulic fracturing of shale gas would be possible, if challenging, in Scotland.
Amid growing calls for an all-out ban, ministers announced further research in January 2015.
This was followed by a moratorium on fracking and on underground coal gasification (UGC), which involves igniting underground coal beds to obtain gas.
However ministers refused to rule out fracking, and later lobbied to have the powers to tax it.
Ahead of last year’s autumn conference, at which the pro-fracking petrochemical giant Ineos paid thousands of pounds for a stall, SNP members worried about the party hierarchy’s intent founded Smaug, or SNP Members Against Unconventional Gas, to campaign for a total ban.
Delegates refused to support a ban, and party bosses then blocked a fresh debate this spring, ruling it was “not the role of conference” to mandate government on “specific policies”.
Holyrood narrowly backed a ban in June after the SNP abstained but the vote was not binding.
Read more: Jeremy Corbyn 'might not campaign in crunch by-election while in Glasgow'
Catherine Shea of Smaug said: “The delay is very disappointing. There was so much pressure on the Broad Alliance against fracking to produce work for this exercise and individuals and groups spent a lot of time on that. There will be a lot of disappointment it’s been deferred.”
Ministers will make a statement to parliament on Thursday about a separate review into UGC, but this is a parallel exercise to the fracking reports.
Green MSP Mark Ruskell said: “Communities across the central belt have been left in limbo. This delay is unacceptable. As we await a ministerial statement on UGC on Thursday, it’s essential the Scottish Government conclude their reports into other forms of unconventional gas extraction as soon as possible, and move towards a ban."
The SNP’s Holyrood manifesto said the party was “deeply sceptical” about fracking and said neither it or UGC would not take place unless it could be proven “beyond any doubt that there is no risk to health, communities or the environment”.
This set an extremely high bar to fracking, as scientific research deals in probabilities rather than absolutes such as “beyond any doubt” and “no risk” whatsoever.
Nicola Sturgeon subsequently rowed back on the commitment, saying it meant “a substantial risk” to the environment rather than a “negligible risk” like crossing the road.
The government said the reports would be published in full before a public consultation during winter 2016/17.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel