DOZENS of petitions urging the UK Government to help some 2.6 million women whose retirement plans have been “shattered” by rapid increases to the state pension age have been delivered to Westminster by SNP MPs.
The petitions, containing several thousand names, demand justice for those women born in the 1950s who, it is argued, have become victims by the acceleration of the timetable to align the state pension ages between the sexes.
While the UK Government has argued that the cost of providing transitional arrangements would be as high as £30 billion, the SNP insists independent research it has commissioned shows the figure to be £8bn.
Local Women Against State Pension Inequality[WASPI] groups have gathered thousands of signatures from their local areas in support of the petitions, calling for action from the UK Government, which SNP MPs have lodged in parliament.
The petitions will be presented in the House of Commons before being sent to Whitehall for a formal government response.
Ian Blackford MP, the SNP’s pensions spokesperson, said: “Around 2.6m women have been unfairly hit by the rapid rises to the state pension age and as a result their retirement plans have been shattered.
“Thousands of signatures have been gathered by local WASPI groups up and down the country, which shows the strength of feeling behind this urgent call to the UK Government to provide support for the women affected by these changes.”
Mr Blackford, who represents Ross, Skye and Lochaber, made clear the argument was not against the equalisation of the state pension age.
“These women have paid National Insurance contributions and are due their pension; it is not a benefit but a contract that the UK Government has broken,” he declared.
Mr Blackford added: “The Tories must do the right thing and listen to the voices of all the WASPI women. By using the surplus in the National Insurance Fund for transitional measures the Tories can afford to provide relief and dignity in retirement for millions of women."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel