A FOODBANK operator has defended the work provided by the service after research claimed that for every person who uses a food bank in Glasgow almost another four face going hungry.
The Go Well research project focused on some of the city's deprived areas where it found one in every 25 households have sought emergency food ration.
The survey of people living in impoverished neighbourhoods found 4.2 per cent had used food banks and 17.3 per cent had occasionally or frequently struggled to meet the cost of food.
Ewan Gurr, of the Trussell Trust, said: "The Go Well research reaffirms the negative impact social disadvantage, including foodbank use, can have on mental wellbeing and I applaud the researchers for including the voices of people experiencing poverty in their report.
"It is extremely useful in reminding us that hidden hunger is a reality many face but, as acknowledged by the authors, it’s clear more research is needed."
But he added: "We need to move beyond unhelpful descriptions of foodbanks as ‘shameful’, language which only exacerbates the stigma attached to people who need to use foodbanks, and start identifying solutions to help us transition from a tourniquet to triage type of response.
"Foodbanks, however, have never been presented as a panacea and to describe them as a poor solution to food insecurity is like suggesting the medical profession is a poor solution to ill health."
The research came from interviews for the Go Well project, which is examining regeneration, with 3,614 residents living in deprived parts of Glasgow in 2015.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel