MEPs Steven Woolfe and Mike Hookem have been reported to French police over their altercation at the European Parliament which plunged crisis-hit Ukip into further turmoil.
Mr Woolfe was left in hospital after the fracas in Strasbourg which led to him quitting Ukip and abandoning his bid to become the party's leader.
European Parliament president Martin Schulz said he had referred the matter to the French authorities "given the seriousness of the reported facts and their possible criminal implications".
Read more: UK Government 'faces £84bn Brexit-related black hole'
Mr Schulz said he referred the "regrettable" incident to the authorities after a recommendation from the European Parliament's advisory committee on conduct.
He told the parliament: "(The committee) concluded that the versions of the facts given by the two members involved diverged substantially and the facts seem to have happened in the absence of direct witnesses.
"It also stressed that given the seriousness of the reported facts and their possible criminal implications, further evidence is needed to clarify this matter.
"As a result I have decided to follow the recommendation of the advisory committee and I have referred this matter to the competent French authorities.
"Based on the result of the investigations I will then take a decision about a sanction to be imposed."
Read more: UK Government 'faces £84bn Brexit-related black hole'
Mr Woolfe abandoned his bid to become Ukip leader last week, claiming the party was "ungovernable" without Nigel Farage at the helm.
He stood by his claim that he had "received a blow" from Ukip MEP Mr Hookem during the altercation at a private meeting at the European Parliament building and revealed he had made a police complaint about the incident.
Mr Hookem has denied hitting the North West MEP and the fallout from the October 6 incident has continued with claims that Mr Woolfe had received warnings about "inappropriate behaviour" from senior party figures.
Yorkshire and the Humber MEP Mr Hookem also claimed Mr Woolfe had signed in for 306 euro (£276) daily allowances at the European Parliament three times while recovering from his injuries earlier this month.
Mr Woolfe, who will sit as an independent, said last week that the incident led to him being treated by doctors for two seizures, partial paralysis and the loss of feeling in his face and body.
He insisted a blow from Mr Hookem knocked him back into the meeting room where Ukip MEPs were discussing reports that Mr Woolfe was in talks about defecting to the Conservatives.
Read more: UK Government 'faces £84bn Brexit-related black hole'
Mr Hookem has said Mr Woolfe's political career "was over once he showed disloyalty to the Ukip party and membership when he held talks to join the Tories".
Mr Woolfe had been seen as frontrunner in the race to replace Diane James, whose term as Ukip leader lasted just 18 days.
The new Ukip leader will be announced on November 28, with nominations to replace Ms James closing on October 31.
Among the contenders are Suzanne Evans, Paul Nuttall and Raheem Kassam.
Also running is John Rees-Evans, who apologised this week over his controversial 2014 claim that a "homosexual donkey" tried to rape his horse, describing the comments as "playful banter".
Mr Hookem said he had "no problem with any fair inquiry as it will demonstrate that I did not hit Steven Woolfe".
He said he had challenged Mr Schulz to repeat his "defamatory" statement outside the European Parliament, where he would not have immunity from legal action.
Mr Hookem went on: "I'm afraid all I was met with was mealy words from a long-term bully pretending to be the tough guy but refusing to leave his plush, taxpayer-funded feather nest and parliamentary privilege.
"If you have the guts, Mr President, to repeat your false allegations outside of the Hemicycle (the chamber), then yes, I will see you in court.
"Or you could spare us all the time and money and just apologise for your comments and your kangaroo court."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article