THE heads of one of Scotland’s most financially inept health boards have been awarded bonuses.
Senior managers at NHS Tayside pocketed the rises after getting positive grades for their performance - despite the organisation relying on bail-outs from the taxpayer.
A damning report by Audit Scotland this month laid bare the long-term financial challenges facing NHS Tayside, which serves nearly 400,000 people.
A £11.6m potential deficit in 2016/17 has been projected, which could increase if planned savings are not met.
The report also confirmed that the board had received £24.3m in support from the Scottish Government over the last four years to plug financial black holes.
In 2015/16, NHS Tayside was given £5million to cover pressures such as staffing and prescribing costs, but in the same year previous bailout money was not repaid.
It added: "Money from one-off sales of property is not a sustainable way to help manage the board's finances."
However, despite the wayward financial mismanagement, senior NHS Tayside staff have still enjoyed performance-related "progression" increases.
The performance of executive and senior managers across the NHS is judged according to five categories: unacceptable; incomplete; fully acceptable; superior; and outstanding.
An unacceptable rating merits no increase, but the other categories currently trigger rises of between 1% and 3%. The regime applies to staff earning between £44,810 and £179,108.
Figures covering two bailout years - 2013/14 and 2014/15 - reveal no senior managers were given an “unacceptable” rating.
The number of bosses judged to have an “incomplete” performance stood at less than five, while 111 individuals were deemed “fully acceptable”.
Another 32 senior staff fell in the “superior” bracket, but nobody was “outstanding”.
Labour MSP Jenny Marra, the convener of the Parliament’s Public Audit committee, said: “I think frontline staff and patients would question the fairness of NHS managers in Tayside receiving performance bonus payments when the finances of the health board are in such disarray.
“NHS Tayside will have to make nearly £60m of cuts this year, they are running a deficit of £11m and will have to go back to the Scottish Government for the fourth year running to ask for a loan. Far too much money is being spent on agency nurses and prescribing. With things in this situation it is very difficult to see why senior managers deserve additional payment awards.”
Tory MSP Donald Cameron said: “It is staggering that NHS Tayside have chosen to pay out these bonuses given the current financial problems they’re facing.
“Having already gone millions of pounds over budget they need to be spending as sensibly as possible, not throwing away more funds on unnecessary bonuses.
“Most people wouldn’t expect to be given a bonus for simply doing an ‘acceptable’ job, and NHS Tayside need to urgently reconsider whether these payments are appropriate.”
An NHS Tayside spokesperson said: "All performance review arrangements are undertaken in line with instructions issued through Scottish Government Circulars, including national scrutiny of any recommendations made by Health Boards with regard to individual performance assessments."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel