Creating new income tax bands may be a better way for the Scottish Government to raise its revenues than simply increasing the levy on top earners, an economics expert has suggested.
Professor David Bell cautioned against raising the top rate of income tax to 50p - as Scottish Labour proposes to fund public services - saying research indicates a previous tax hike of this scale had had "no effect on revenues".
He suggested opting for a more "Scandinavian solution", where additional tax bands are created between the current 20p basic rate and the higher 40p rate, could generate more money for Holyrood.
Read more: House of Lords - ‘English votes for English laws’ risks damaging the Union
He raised the possibility as he gave evidence to MSPs on the Finance Committee, warning that the economy could be "in for a difficult period where hard choices are going to have to be made" over the coming years.
Prof Bell, from Stirling University, said the "sudden and dramatic" depreciation in the value of Sterling in the wake of the Brexit vote "is likely to lead to a rapid rise in inflation".
He continued: "This will almost certainly lead to a decline in real income since wages are unlikely to keep up with that rate of increase in prices, and that is likely to lead to a slowdown in the economy."
While he said the UK economy is currently "performing quite well", he added that tax revenues "are not performing as well as might be expected given the rate of growth in the economy".
Read more: House of Lords - ‘English votes for English laws’ risks damaging the Union
Prof Bell warned the country could be "entering a somewhat difficult and uncertain period where the sources of growth are not obvious".
With Holyrood to be responsible for setting income tax rates and bands from April 2017, he said Scottish Government ministers would effectively control around 40% of the total tax revenue generated north of the border.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has already ruled out increasing the highest rate of income tax, applied only to those earning more than £150,000 a year, from 45p to 50p in 2017-18
Prof Bell said : "One has to be very careful about the use of these powers.
"Certainly one could introduce new bands and spread the costs of income tax somewhat more down the income distribution, that's really the Scandinavian solution to having high provision of public services, it's not that you have very high top rates, it's more that you have more progressive rates because you introduce intermediate bands to income tax.
Read more: House of Lords - ‘English votes for English laws’ risks damaging the Union
"It would certainly be open to the Scottish Government to introduce new bands, there's no question it could do that and could generate additional revenues from so doing."
Professor David Heald, an expert in public sector accounting from the University of Glasgow, told the MSPs: "I've long thought that the jump from 20% income tax rate to 40% income tax rate was actually too abrupt."
Green co-convener and finance spokesman Patrick Harvie said: "The Scottish Greens were the first to propose bold, creative approaches to income tax during this year's election. By splitting the basic rate into two, we can raise additional revenue for public services while cutting the income tax paid by everyone earning less than the average salary.
"Greens also want to ensure that people on high incomes - MSPs for example - make a fair contribution, and the uncertainty arising from Brexit and its impact on living standards only increases the case for a more progressive tax system.
"What's essential is that the new tax powers are used not only to protect public services but also to make Scotland a fairer and more equal country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel