The former head of the Child Sexual Abuse Inquiry has blamed "relentless" media pressure for undermining colleagues' confidence in her leadership.
Dame Lowell Goddard told a parliamentary committee that she believed campaigners published articles in the press in the hope of dealing a "fatal" blow to the inquiry by forcing her to become the third head to resign the post.
In an eight-page written submission to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee (HASC), the New Zealand judge - who sensationally resigned in August - acknowledged there were "tensions" within the inquiry team but insisted that concerns about the quality of her leadership were never raised with her.
Read more: Extending child abuse inquiry's remit will lengthen process, warns minister
HASC chairwoman Yvette Cooper urged Dame Lowell to give evidence in person to the cross-party committee, to allow MPs to put "precise and specific questions" to her.
Ms Cooper rejected the judge's argument that it was more "effective" for her to detail her experiences in writing, insisting that oral evidence - if necessary by video link from New Zealand - was "essential".
Ms Cooper also rebuffed a plea from Dame Lowell's successor Alexis Jay for the committee to "consider carefully" before calling any more members of the inquiry to give evidence.
Read more: Extending child abuse inquiry's remit will lengthen process, warns minister
Prof Jay warned it was "vital" for the inquiry to concentrate on its work and maintain its independence, but Ms Cooper retorted in a letter: "It will be for the committee to decide when and whom to call on to give further evidence."
The Labour MP told Prof Jay: "Given the two-year history of problems in the inquiry, it is vitally important that there is some transparency over the things that have gone wrong in the past, and the way it is working now, so people can have confidence that problems are now resolved and the work is back on track."
In a submission sent to the committee on October 28, Dame Lowell complained she had been the victim of "extensive, false and defamatory" media comment since her resignation, including remarks attributed to anonymous members of the HASC.
She urged Ms Cooper to investigate the "leak of false information" from the committee to the press and warned that it would be "unjust ... and prejudicial to me" if any of the allegations were repeated under cover of parliamentary privilege.
Read more: Extending child abuse inquiry's remit will lengthen process, warns minister
Explaining the background to her resignation, Dame Lowell said the inquiry had been subject to "real and increasing strain" since March from "intensifying" media criticism.
This centred on claims of unfairness in the investigation of allegations against late Labour peer Lord Janner and "developed into widening personal attacks on me and my competence", including reports about her extended absence overseas, she said.
By late July, the reports had had "a damaging internal impact on the inquiry and me", said Dame Lowell, adding: "I believe this is when the team lost their nerve about my ability to continue leading the inquiry, which I perceived to be the objective of those behind the publications.
"I considered both the impact of this campaign and the effect which I saw it to have. The allegations were false but they had already done their damage.
"I nevertheless believed that, having made the commitment to the victims and survivors, I had to continue to see it through. I was also very concerned that if the inquiry lost a third chair that might prove fatal for it, which was clearly what the campaigners were seeking to achieve.
"The pressure was relentless, as was the impact on panel members and all who felt deeply their responsibility to the inquiry."
It was only after three members of the inquiry's panel came to see her on August 4 and made clear she no longer had the support of senior colleagues that she decided to quit.
Read more: Extending child abuse inquiry's remit will lengthen process, warns minister
Dame Lowell insisted that the decision to resign was hers alone, adding: "There was no contact with the Home Secretary or the Home Office before I made my decision and no earlier pressure either."
She said she regarded the decision as "right", but she regretted not calling Home Secretary Amber Rudd personally to tender her resignation.
She said a panel member had later confirmed that the team's "loss of confidence in my leadership" had been prompted by adverse press commentary on her performance at a preliminary hearing into Lord Janner's case on July 26. But she insisted she did not regard the criticism as "justified".
She added: "I categorically deny that there was any basis for any allegation of misconduct raised, or causing, or connected to my resignation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article