THE SNP government will finally publish around 1000 pages of analysis on the potential impact of fracking in Scotland today.
Energy minister Paul Wheelhouse will issue six reports, originally due out this summer, on the unconventional gas extraction technique, paving the way for a public consultation on licensing.
The files - on health, climate change, economics, transport, decommissioning and seismic activity - will be shared with other parties an hour before a statement at Holyrood.
Critics say fracking, which involves pumping pressurised water and chemicals into shale beds to release gas, is a risk to health and the environment.
Labour, LibDem and Green MSPs want to ban it, while the Conservatives support it.
Ineos, the owners of Grangemouth, who currently import fracked gas from America, also want to drill shale beds across central Scotland.
The SNP began a moratorium on fracking in January 2015 and their Holyrood manifesto said it would be banned unless it was “proven beyond doubt” there was “no risk”.
Labour environment spokeswoman Claudia Beamish said the government should ban it now.
“The climate change science is already irrefutable; we don’t need another fossil fuel and we shouldn’t lock ourselves into relying on one when we need to move on to clean energy.”
Mary Church of Friends of the Earth Scotland said: “Nations must commit to leaving fossil fuels in the ground and we hope that the Scottish Government will put climate change at the forefront of its decision-making on fracking.”
WWF Scotland director Lang Banks added: "Any considered review of the evidence should lead to the conclusion that there is no place for fracking in Scotland's energy future.”
Last month Mr Wheelhouse banned a separate unconventional gas technology which involves igniting coal underground to release gas. A spokesman for the government said its approach would be "precautionary, robust and evidence-based approach”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here