One in five Scottish farmers and crofters may retire early due to fears over Brexit, and over half worry that leaving Europe will further increase uncertainty for their businesses, according to a new survey.
This may lead to lower investment in farms and crofts, which in turn will have a negative impact on the wider rural economy, the report by Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) says.
It argues that in an ageing industry more control must be passed to younger people who may be more ready to adopt the new approaches.
It highlights how vitally important the financial support from the European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is to those working on the land, compounding their fears over Brexit
It says "The reason that CAP grabs so much attention in Scotland is because it plays a very important role in ensuring
Scottish farms, on average, are profitable....in 2015 only dairy farming returned a profit before CAP support, with production costs exceeding production incomes in all other sectors."
CAP subsidies accounted for 60 per cent of total farm output for sheep farms in less favoured areas (LFAs) such as mountainous or hilly land, and 48 per cent for LFA cattle and sheep farms. But only 8 per cent for dairy farms, whose success is dependent on the price of milk.
One third of all those surveyed indicated that with Brexit they are likely to need to increase off-farm income or diversify their businesses.
The report, based on a survey of over 700, finds that in recent years the amount of Scottish farm debt has reached record levels of over £3 billion, although this has coincided with a period of low interest rates.
But the number of full time occupiers of agricultural holdings has fallen by about a third in the last three decades. Meanwhile a third of farmers and crofters are over 65 with nearly 60 per cent over 55 years of age. In contrast only 10 per cent are under 40.
Steven Thomson, Senior Agricultural Economist with SRUC, said: “Brexit is clearly causing uncertainty, and some farmers have told us that means they are thinking of retiring earlier than planned. Scottish agriculture is used to change. Some of that has been in response to market demands and environmental pressure, but a key driver has been the various CAP regimes. Our report shows how vital that support has been, and still is, to the industry, especially the beef and sheep sectors.
“Under Brexit, we don’t know what will replace it yet but assume there will be budgetary pressures - meaning innovation and new approaches will be key to making farming more resilient. Being traditionally unsupported by the CAP, soft fruit growers, pig producers and others have shown the way. It is no coincidence they tend to be run by a younger generation – ready and able to grab opportunities, adopting new technologies and research ideas.”
The report's authors argue: “With Brexit we need to understand the characteristics, needs and contributions of all of Scotland’s businesses more than ever.” They say it is falsely assumed that the rural economy means agriculture. Yet the success of businesses involving wildlife tourism, food and drink, energy production or a wide range of service-related activities all challenge these assumptions.
Allan Bowie, President of NFU Scotland said: “Whether it is the 65,000 people directly employed in Scottish agriculture or the 360,000 employed in the wider food and drink industry in Scotland, the vote by the UK to leave Europe has created a degree of uncertainty that governments must quickly address.
“NFU Scotland is crystal clear that the contribution of the Scottish agricultural industry to the wider economy must not be undersold in Brexit discussions. Agriculture has a fundamental role to play in Scotland’s future, but this future can only be secured by the right policy framework in a post-Brexit era."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel