A GROUP of former Labour councillors are planning to stand against their old colleagues in North Lanarkshire, in a move which could help the SNP gain the council.
Around 10 councillors intend to form a new party, provisionally called the Independents Alliance, to stand against official Labour candidates in next May’s local elections.
The group, who were deselected in a clear-out under new council leader Jim Logue, include past Labour veterans Sam Love, Jim Brooks and John Higgins.
Cllr Love, spokesman for the group, said he expected at least 11 councillors to stand.
He said the motivation was a feeling that Labour has lost its way and strayed from its socialist roots, as well as disaffection with Cllr Logue.
He said: “It’s going to happen. We’re all Labour people. We’ll listen to our communities.
"We represent a part of central Scotland where people have low wages, low esteem, kids that can’t reach the attainment they should.
“We’ve had 20 or 30 years of Labour MPs used as voting fodder for middle England, but no more.
"The Labour Party stinks. Tony Blair started it. There are good socialist people out there. We need to talk to our people and prioritise what’s right.”
Cllrs Brooks and Higgins quit Labour earlier this week complaining they had been victims of “bias and ill-will” in the party, saying Labour was now in a “desperate situation”.
A wave of recent resignations has reduced Labour to a minority administration in North Lanarkshire, with 32 of the 70 seats, the SNP on 22, and Independents 16.
The Alliance could split the Labour vote next year, assisting the SNP to become the largest party.
A similar rebellion happened in Glasgow in 2012, after a cull of so-called ‘deadwood’ councillors from Labour benches saw several stand under the Glasgow First banner.
However only one was elected - Stephen Dornan in Govan - and he later joined the SNP.
A Scottish Labour spokesman said: “Next May Labour will put forward the strongest possible group of candidates who will stand up for their local communities against cuts from the SNP.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel