NICOLA Sturgeon has called on Theresa May to seize a spirit of compromise and meet the Scottish Government “half-way” to allow Scotland to stay in the European single market.
But while the First Minister warned the Prime Minister that she was “not bluffing” about holding a second independence referendum if a hard Brexit was realised, she indicated that a vote would not happen “within the timescale of Brexit” ie before spring 2019.
Ms Sturgeon’s political opponents accused her of seeking to use Brexit to whip up support for independence and sow division and discord; the FM, they argued, should concentrate instead on sorting out the problems in Scotland’s schools and hospitals.
Read more: Flagship SNP scheme to twin schools to drive up standards 'shelved' after three years
Mrs May, meantime, appearing on Sky News, indicated that what she wanted was for Britain to have maximum access to the single market rather than membership, noting how she would not try to "keep bits of membership". She said Britain wanted to take back control of immigration and secure a "really good, ambitious trade deal" with the EU.
Earlier appearing on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, the FM said the key issue now was about finding “compromise ground” on achieving practical solutions to overcome the difficulties of the complex issue of Brexit.
“If we are going to get into the practical discussion about how these things can be overcome, we first have to have a UK Government that’s going to meet the Scottish Government half-way to try to discuss that. I’m compromising. I’m prepared to compromise. I need to have a UK Government that’s prepared to do likewise.”
Ms Sturgeon said the issue of independence was “much bigger than the European Union” and argued that Scotland faced a fundamental question if the PM could not find what she believed was a sensible compromise and told Scots to “like it or lump it” on the issue of Brexit.
In such circumstances, she explained: “The question for Scotland – and it’s a much more fundamental question than the EU or Brexit – is are we happy with that; are we happy to have no voice in the UK, to simply have to accept the direction of travel that an increasingly right-wing UK Government wants to impose upon us?”
Read more: Flagship SNP scheme to twin schools to drive up standards 'shelved' after three years
Indeed, the SNP leader said it would be right for Scots, faced with the prospect of Tory rule from London for possibly the next 20 years, to be given the opportunity to have another vote on their future.
However, Ms Sturgeon suggested so-called “indyref2” might not happen for some time yet, saying the nation would “not have to have that decision within the timescale of Brexit”; as things stand, not until after spring 2019. Indeed, with a general election in 2020 and a Holyrood poll in 2021, then the earliest practical date for a second independence poll, taking into account the parliamentary processes, could be 2022.
At Holyrood, Ruth Davidson said the SNP once again was “trying desperately to use Brexit as a means of whipping up support for independence; they have failed”.
The Scottish Conservative leader urged the FM to “start acting in the interests of all Scots, not simply playing to her Nationalist base; that means ruling out another referendum to give Scottish business the certainty it needs, and to concentrate on clearing up her party’s own mess on education”.
Kezia Dugdale, the Scottish Labour leader, branded Ms Sturgeon’s remarks “yet another attempt by the SNP to sow division and uncertainty at a time when the country needs to pull together more than ever”.
Willie Rennie, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader, accused the SNP leader of being “all over the place on independence”.
Read more: Flagship SNP scheme to twin schools to drive up standards 'shelved' after three years
"The First Minister should get on with the day job: sorting out the NHS; education system and our police," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel