DOWNING Street has hit back at Moscow, criticising Russia’s record on human rights, freedom of speech, the economy and the war in Syria in response to its embassy's claims that Britain was preparing an "official witch-hunt" against the Putin government.
In a continuing tit-for-tat spat, the Russian embassy in London claimed "Western elites" were in "panic and hysterics" over their loss of control in Europe and accused Britain of planning to brief Donald Trump's incoming US administration against Moscow.
It followed a claim by Boris Johnson, the Foreign Secretary, who in the House of Commons told MPs Russia was "up to all sorts of very dirty tricks" such as cyber-warfare.
When asked about the Russian Government’s claims against the UK, Theresa May’s spokeswoman insisted they did not merit a response but then she gave one, saying: “If you want to look at the record of the UK Government in recent years and make comparisons with the Russians, you might think about: negative economic growth in Russia and the UK being one of the fastest-growing major economies in the world; how many times the UK has consistently advanced and supported UN Security Council resolutions on Syria, Russia was meanwhile vetoing them; the fact that we have freedom of expression and a free press in the UK, who will choose what they report.
"Those are just the realities of the UK Government versus the Russians. You ought to look at what the UK Government's record of actions are and what the Russian record of actions are."
In its lengthy post, the Russian embassy speculated that Theresa May's Government was seeking to rerun the Brexit referendum by claiming it was tainted by Russian influence and attacked the British intelligence services.
The embassy also suggested the UK's loud condemnations of Russian military action in Syria were intended to divert attention from its "complicity in the deliberate obliteration of Yemen".
It claimed Britain had "outsourced" the fight against Islamist extremism to Russia in the same way the defeat of Nazi Germany was "outsourced" to the Soviet Union.
"We don't expect HMG to win this argument in an open and reasoned debate," said the post. "We also think that it is plainly wrong for one UNSC[UN Security Council] permanent member to brief against another."
Elsewhere, a senior Labour source called for a "ratcheting down" of tensions between Russia and the West, particularly on the border between Nato countries and Russia and in the Middle East.
He stressed how Jeremy Corbyn had repeatedly voiced criticisms of the Russian Government over its actions in the Middle East and domestically but added: "What we don't want to see is a ratcheting up of tensions between Russia and the West, as has been taking place. We want to see an engagement with Russia on a critical basis but a serious basis."
The source said Mr Corbyn had "expressed concerns" about the deployment of hundreds of UK troops to Russia's neighbour Estonia, where RAF Typhoon fighter jets have also been involved in the interception of Russian warplanes.
"We've said repeatedly that we want talks and engagement to wind down military tensions, particularly on the Nato/Russian border and in the Middle East. Jeremy has expressed concerns about that being one of the escalations of tensions that have taken place," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel