Sir Paul McCartney has stepped up a bid to reclaim the ownership of the many Beatles hits he wrote with John Lennon.
Sir Paul filed a lawsuit against Sony/ATV, the publishing giant that holds the rights to classics including Love Me Do and All You Need Is Love, on Wednesday.
The original rights to the songs, penned by Sir Paul and Lennon between 1962 and 1971, were sold by the pair at the time in exchange for royalties.
Sir Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr (Yui Mok/PA)
The catalogue was then famously bought by Michael Jackson in 1985 and was sold to Sony/ATV following the star’s death in 2009.
Under US copyright law, Sir Paul can soon reclaim the rights to the hits.
Love Me Do will be the first song eligible to be claimed back in October 2018, with the rest of the collection’s time limits elapsing at various dates ending in 2026.
Michael Jackson (Yui Mok/PA)
Sir Paul has requested a ruling that states Sony/ATV cannot accuse him of a breach of contract or publishing agreement.
The papers state: ([The) Defendants have attempted to reserve their rights to challenge Paul McCartney's exercise of his termination rights on contractual ground.
It adds: "A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time so that Paul McCartney can rely on quiet, unclouded title to his rights."
Sir Paul McCartney (Yui Mok/PA)
Sony/ATV told US magazine Rolling Stone it was “disappointed” by the lawsuit and described it as “both unnecessary and premature”.
The publisher said: “Sony/ATV has the highest respect for Sir Paul McCartney with whom we have enjoyed a long and mutually rewarding relationship with respect to the treasured Lennon and McCartney song catalogue.
“We have collaborated closely with both Sir Paul and the late John Lennon’s Estate for decades to protect, preserve and promote the catalogue’s long-term value.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here