By Amalie C Nash , USA TODAY
White nationalist Richard Spencer, whose appearances have sparked controversy and protests, was twice punched by a masked protester in Washington D.C., following Trump's inauguration.
Video footage posted online shows Spencer, a leader of the alt-right movement, speaking near the corner of 14th and K Street around 2:30 p.m. when he is suddenly approached and punched twice. On Twitter, Spencer at first brushed off the assault, saying he can take a punch.
"I was just physically assaulted twice by antifas. No serious damage. I can take a punch," he wrote.
Richard Spencer got punched in the face during the protests at Trump's #inauguration pic.twitter.com/oQAwtbtEeT
— Gender-Professecs (@MrTrunney) January 20, 2017
Spencer then went live in a 10-minute video in which he called the assault "a really terrible thing."
Spencer said he was walking with two people from the "Stateless Media" who are doing a documentary on him and the alt-right when they happened upon a "serious demonstration" in Franklin Square. He said he was recognized, people started gathering around him and suddenly a masked man punched him. "But he didn't really land it, and it didn't really hurt," he said.
He said he was then being interviewed when the man returned and sucker-punched him on the side of his head. Spencer said others moved in and protected him, but someone else got near and spat on him.
"They occurred in the most cowardly fashion possible," he said of the assaults. He noted that it was hard to hear from one ear and suggested he may have a mild concussion.
Spencer said he's used to "anti-fascists" confronting him, but that the attacks have escalated. He said he's now considering getting security.
In November, Spencer was in D.C. for a white nationalist gathering, when he was caught on video shouting “Hail Trump!” to a crowd that responded with Nazi salutes.
The same month, Spencer was banned from Twitter, but the social media channel later reinstated his account.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel