A former chairman of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry is suing the Scottish Government for £500,000 in loss of earnings and damage to her reputation following her departure from the role last year.
According to papers lodged at the Court of Session, Susan O’Brien, QC, is says she was forced out after attempting to defend the inquiry’s independence from Government.
She was asked to quit after a psychologist working with the inquiry objected to comments she had allegedly made in a private meeting. These were put in the public domain by Education Secretary John Swinney, who said that, if they had become known to survivors, they would have made her position “untenable”.
However, the court papers say Ms O’Brien “considered that she had a duty to inform the public that the inquiry’s independence was being actively undermined by the defenders[the Scottish Government]”.
They add: “It was an implied term of her contract that as chair she would defend the independence of the inquiry from any interference and control by government.”
She was backed at the time by Glenn Houston, who is still working on the Inquiry team, and Professor Michael Lamb, who also resigned his position on the grounds of Government interference.
At Parliament House in Edinburgh, yesterday, Lady Smith insisted the SCAI would operate free of interference. She said: “Had I any concerns about its ability to do so, I would not have accepted this appointment.”
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “Ministers have acted appropriately at all times and continue to be committed to the independence of the inquiry.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel