SPORTS and leisure services in Stirling are set to be entirely privatised amid fears the radical plan will undermine the health and well-being of residents.
In an unprecedented move, Stirling will agree to hand control of all its sports and leisure portfolio to a private operator in a contract running until 2042 worth around £25million. It is the first wholsesale privatisation of a frotnline service in Scotland.
The Labour and Tory coalition will confirm the deal with Sports and Leisure Management (SLM) at a meeting on Thursday, with protests by staff and unions planned beforehand.
SLM already provide services to around 40 councils south of the border and “prides itself on being a community-focused company, with a passion for improving the health and well being of our nation”.
But concerns have been raised that the new venture will lose the public sector ethos required for local authorities to tackle health and social inequalities.
Stirling’s opposition have also complained that they arc expected to approve the deal while being kept in the dark about potential new pricing structures, how the services will be managed and how SLM will make money from the arrangement.
SNP group leader Scott Farmer said: “We don’t even know what we’re voting for. The administration say its about enhancing a service but how?
“We’re told SLM will also deliver £2m in savings. I really can’t see how that can be delivered without cutting back services and staff terms and conditions.”
The council’s leisure services are currently provided by Active Stirling, an offshoot of the authority set up in 2006. The authority has said it was legally obliged to put the contract out to tender “to ensure best value for the taxpayer”.
But The Herald has learned Stirling held a series of discussions with the municipal leisure trusts in both Glasgow and Edinburgh about joint ventures which would have avoided the need to go to the market but opted for the outsourcing route.
Once source familiar with the deal said: “People are really taken aback Stirling has gone for a straight commercial operation. When you outsource something like IT its really a straight contractual relationship.
“Sport and leisure is one of those areas you don’t want to lose that public sector ethos. Trusts and arms-length charities can become more commercially aware over time but they keep that ethos which gives the flexibility to do something about disadvantage or supporting a development.
“Otherwise you;re in danger of everything being governed by the contract.”
Unison said: “There has been no consultation with the trade unions and it is further disappointing that despite a commitment from the council not to privatise services this is now the position. We have huge concerns as it does not make reference to the Scottish Living Wage, trade union recognition, TUPE or any job losses.”
SLM have stated that they will apply for charitable status through an offshoot trust and their private companies will supply it with food, fitness, IT and other services.
A Stirling Council spokeswoman said: “We invest more than £1m a year in the delivery of sports and leisure provision and we know how important these services are to our communities.
“The current contract has been in place since 2006, and subject to several extensions. Legally, the council could not continue indefinitely extending the contract, so in December 2015 took the decision to tender and undertake a competitive procurement process to ensure best value for the taxpayer.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel