A REVIEW of the Holyrood law intended to stop outbursts of “hedge rage” has already received complaints about it failing to work in practice.

MSPs on the local government committee announced last week that they would examine whether the High Hedges had made a difference since coming into effect in 2014.

The law was designed to help resolve disputes between neighbours over outsize hedges such as Leylandii, which can dwarf houses and cast them into permanent shade.

The legislation defines a high hedge as a row of two or more evergreen or semi-evergreen trees or shrubs over 2m tall which block the light.

People unhappy with a high hedge can apply to their council for a “high hedge notice” if their neighbour’s greenery “adversely affects the enjoyment” of their home.

Councils can then issue enforcement orders to owners and, if ignored, cut down the hedges.

But within days of the review’s launch, two members of the public raised ongoing problems.

One said she and her neighbours had “hit rock bottom” after “fruitless” discussions with council officials about a group of 50ft trees which cast homes into darkness, caused plants to die and turned gardens to mud, and whose falling branches damaged sheds and garages.

Another person asked for help with a case involving “the overshadowing of solar panels by a row of neighbouring trees and the aggrieved party has offered to pay for pollarding”.

Committee convener Bob Doris said: "While it can be a rare occurrence, overgrown hedges can be a serious nuisance - especially when they lead to disagreements or 'hedge rage'.

“We want to hear from those with experience in this area so that we can give a considered view to the wider parliament on whether or not the Act could be improved."

The committee has asked for submissions on the definition of a high hedge, appeals and enforcement procedures, fees and costs, and the impact of the law on people’s lives.