PARENTS may be putting newborn babies at risk, a charity has warned, after a survey found many were happy to let their baby sleep on their stomach or side.
The Lullaby Trust said about half of parents are unsure of basic steps they can take to reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
SIDS, also known as cot death, is the sudden unexplained death of an apparently healthy baby.
READ MORE: Dugdale and Davidson also victims of campaign of hate by criminal trolls
It hit the headlines in 1991 after TV star Anne Diamond’s son Sebastian died in his cot.She launched a sleep campaign in light of research showing babies were far less likely to die if they were put to sleep on their backs.
But the Lullaby Trust is concerned some parents are unaware of or ignore this message, while others do not know about the risks of drinking and sharing a sofa with a baby. It polled 500 parents of children under two and found 15 per cent thought it was fine for children to sleep on their tummies.
One in four parents also thought it was fine for babies to sleep on their sides.
This is despite 87 per cent being aware that putting a baby on their back for every sleep reduces the risk of SIDS. Doing so reduces the risk of SIDS six times.
There were 230 sudden infant deaths in the UK in 2014.
The trust says babies should be put to sleep on their backs in a cot that is free of bumpers, toys and pillows.
READ MORE: Dugdale and Davidson also victims of campaign of hate by criminal trolls
Francine Bates, chief executive of the charity, said: “The survey results have shown us we need to go back to basics.”
Robert Weeks, whose daughter Sophia died of SIDS, said: “On January 3, 2012 our lives changed forever when our beautiful daughter Sophia died suddenly. We have still never had an explanation for why. We were one of 221 families that year whose child died for no apparent reason.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel