LABOUR held on to power in Falkirk last time round through a coalition with the Conservatives.
A back-room deal had to be hammered out when Labour landed 14 seats, the SNP 13, the Conservatives two and the independents three, making up the 32 five years ago.
Next week 60 candidates will challenge for a seat on Falkirk Council, with the SNP putting forward 15 names, Labour 13 and the Conservatives nine.
There are also 12 independents, nine greens, one Ukip and one member of Solidarity standing for a ward.
In 2012 Labour kept control of the former Falkirk heartland by striking the pact with the two Conservatives and one of the independents to form an unlikely coalition.
The SNP has been active in opposition at the council and called for an overhaul of administrative rules because change was being blocked at the authority, a claim denied by Labour.
Last year council leader Craig Martin, who held the post for the last six years, won a vote of confidence following SNP calls for him to stand down.
A motion put forward by the SNP’s Tom Coleman, who is standing next week, said there was “increasing concern with regard to this council’s management of public funds, in particular recent financial decisions that have caused damage to the council’s reputation”.
A ditched new council headquarters plan was dubbed a vanity project and cited as an example of the administration’s problems. Mr Martin said, however, Labour had led moves for 500 new council houses, more than 200 ex-council homes brought back into public ownership and over 300 socially rented properties built. He is not standing this time round.
Following boundary changes, the number of councillors needed falls from 32 in 2012 to 30 this time around, with Falkirk South and Grangemouth both cut from four to three.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel